Skip to content
One Accord Supporting Organization Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Community foundation

One Accord Supporting Organization Inc

To provide funding to charities in fulfillment of the exempt purposes of national christian charitable foundation, inc.

$230k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$230k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of One Accord Supporting Organization Inc’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
’20
1
’21
0
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Philanthropy$3.4MHealth$125kReligion$117kInternational$78kHuman Services$70kEducation$50kHousing & Shelter$50kFood & Nutrition$25k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$230,186
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$230,186
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRISTIAN HELP: $17k → 11%LIFEWORK LEADERSHIP: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jesus Food

Jesus food is a non-profit organization whose mission is to provide a fully nutritious meal everyday to starving children of all ages around the world. we also believe that by bringing them into a relationship with jesus christ, and…

Religion
2
Jesus Connecting the Dots
Food & Nutrition
3
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
4
Christian Mission Charities Inc

Christian support for third world countr

International
5
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
6
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
7
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
8
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
9
Map 10 40

To minister the gospel of jesus christ to poor people, leper colonies, and ethnic groups in sri lanka, israel, india, spain, and several eastern african nations that do not have access to christian churches.

Religion
10
Christ for the World Inc

Conducts daily devotional services and sponsors religious projects in developing countries.

Religion
11
Christian Foundation
—
12
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc; the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $3,412,089 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMY NEIGHBORS CHILDREN INC: $50,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50,000 · OtherThe Russell Home For Atypical Children Inc: $25,000 · OtherADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM-SUNBELT INC: $25,000 · OtherFINDING THE LOST SHEEP INC: $10,000 · OtherINMATES OF THE CROSS MINISTRIES: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,377 · OtherLuis Palau Association: $50,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,000 · ReligionThe Inheritance House: $25,000 · ReligionMAN IN THE MIRROR INC: $15,000 · ReligionCANNONBALL KIDS' CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $25,000 · HealthThe Geneva School Inc: $50,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $25,000 · InternationalArmonia US Inc: $18,000 · InternationalCHRISTIAN HELP FOUNDATION INC: $16,700 · Human ServicesLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC: $3,600 · Human ServicesNo Child Hungry Inc: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$3,417,089Other$177,377Religion$125,000Health$75,000Education$50,000International$43,000Human Services$20,300Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $3,412,089 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Geneva School Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANNONBALL KIDS' CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Russell Home For Atypical Children Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Inheritance House: $25,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNo Child Hungry Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetArmonia US Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP FOUNDATION INC: $16,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMAN IN THE MIRROR INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC: $3,600 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Acahand FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Magruder Chesley G Fd…The Dr P Phillips Fou…The Chatlos Foundatio…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Acahand FoundationDE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Acahand Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Magruder Chesley G Fdn Im · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · The Chatlos Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization One Accord Supporting Organization Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from One Accord Supporting Organization Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to One Accord Supporting Organization Inc?

Find your warmest path to One Accord Supporting Organization Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.0M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on One Accord Supporting Organization’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home