Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

One Accord Supporting Organization Inc

To provide funding to charities in fulfillment of the exempt purposes of national christian charitable foundation, inc.

$230k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$230k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of One Accord Supporting Organization Inc’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
20
1
21
0
22
0
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Philanthropy$3.4MHealth$125kReligion$117kInternational$78kHuman Services$70kEducation$50kHousing & Shelter$50kFood & Nutrition$25k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$230,186
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$230,186
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRISTIAN HELP: $17k → 11%LIFEWORK LEADERSHIP: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jesus Food

Jesus food is a non-profit organization whose mission is to provide a fully nutritious meal everyday to starving children of all ages around the world. we also believe that by bringing them into a relationship with jesus christ, and…

Religion
2
Jesus Connecting the Dots
Food & Nutrition
3
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
4
Christian Mission Charities Inc

Christian support for third world countr

International
5
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
6
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
7
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
8
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
9
Map 10 40

To minister the gospel of jesus christ to poor people, leper colonies, and ethnic groups in sri lanka, israel, india, spain, and several eastern african nations that do not have access to christian churches.

Religion
10
Christ for the World Inc

Conducts daily devotional services and sponsors religious projects in developing countries.

Religion
11
Christian Foundation
12
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc and the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $3,412,089 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyMY NEIGHBORS CHILDREN INC — $50,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $50,000 · OtherThe Russell Home For Atypical Children Inc — $25,000 · OtherADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM-SUNBELT INC — $25,000 · OtherFINDING THE LOST SHEEP INC — $10,000 · OtherINMATES OF THE CROSS MINISTRIES — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $7,377 · OtherLuis Palau Association — $50,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $35,000 · ReligionThe Inheritance House — $25,000 · ReligionMAN IN THE MIRROR INC — $15,000 · ReligionCANNONBALL KIDS' CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthOrlando Health Foundation Inc — $25,000 · HealthThe Geneva School Inc — $50,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $25,000 · InternationalArmonia US Inc — $18,000 · InternationalCHRISTIAN HELP FOUNDATION INC — $16,700 · Human ServicesLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC — $3,600 · Human ServicesNo Child Hungry Inc — $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$3,417,089Other$177,377Religion$125,000Health$75,000Education$50,000International$43,000Human Services$20,300Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $3,412,089 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Geneva School Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCANNONBALL KIDS' CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLuis Palau Association — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Russell Home For Atypical Children Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Inheritance House — $25,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNo Child Hungry Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetArmonia US Inc — $18,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP FOUNDATION INC — $16,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMAN IN THE MIRROR INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC — $3,600 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Acahand FoundationDE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Acahand Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Magruder Chesley G Fdn Im · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · The Chatlos Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization One Accord Supporting Organization Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to One Accord Supporting Organization Inc?

Find your warmest path to One Accord Supporting Organization Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.0M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph