· Private foundation
Oluv C Joynor Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $325k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
- $250k+1 grant · $263k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE HIGHLANDS SCHOOL INC | $262,500 |
| G B CHARITIES INC | $80,000 |
| SAINT IGNATIUS LOYOLA ACADEMY | $54,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $35,000 |
| FREEDOM HILLS THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM | $26,910 |
| OUR MILITARY KIDS | $25,000 |
| THE CAVANAGH HOUSE | $25,000 |
| B&O RAILROAD MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| THE LOYOLA SCHOOL INC | $25,000 |
| 4MYCITY INC | $21,000 |
| UNITED THROUGH READING | $20,000 |
| MARYLAND CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND | $18,000 |
| NEXT ONE UP | $15,000 |
| GATHERING POINT GIVING CIRCLE | $15,000 |
| DYSLEXIA TUTORING PROGRAM | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $242k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HIGHLANDS SCHOOL INC5× · 2020–2025 · $966k · revenue +4%
- GCGB Charities Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $423k · revenue +32% · 39% of their budget
- ASATHLETES SERVING ATHLETES5× · 2020–2024 · $320k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- THTHE HIGHLANDS SCHOOL INCone grant, 2023 · $150k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $50k
- NRNOLAN ROBISON FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $43k · revenue -43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
At talisman, we believe in the transformative, healing power of horses and our natural environment. we serve, empower all, and lead by example with compassion, dignity, and inclusivity.
Blackbird laboratories is an independent nonprofit medical research organization based in baltimore that is focused on conducting medical and scientific research in conjunction with nonprofit hospitals and academic institutions,…
Disability Rights Maryland (DRM) is the only non-profit organization exclusively focused on providing free legal advocacy services to people with all types of disabilities, of all ages and in all settings, statewide.
As a statewide resource center, the school provides outreach, educational and residential services for students to reach their fullest potential by preparing them to be as successful, independent, and well-rounded contributing members of…
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.
The Barry Robinson Center offers programs to improve the lives of children and their families.
Baltimore Lab School is an innovative learning community fostering scholarship and creativity in students with different learning styles. In an environment of inquiry and hands-on exploration, Baltimore Lab School students learn to…
Maryland new directions' mission is to train and coach people facing career and life transitions to overcome barriers, restore self-belief, and acquire the skills and tools needed to secure employment on a path to a living wage.
To provide the highest quality healthcare services to the community we serve through our vision statement: outstanding people, exceptional service and uncompromising quality.
Serving the interests of independent higher education and supporting the work of campus leaders throughout the state of maryland.
To provide extensive comprehensive services to eradicate homelessness among the military veteran community. MCVET participants work through recovery, work toward maintaining livable wages, and permanent housing solutions. The organization…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HIGHLANDS SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds GB Charities Inc ↗
- Who funds ATHLETES SERVING ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HILLS THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VALHALLA SAILING PROJECT LTD ↗
- Who funds TALMAR INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds DYSLEXIA TUTORING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds UNITED THROUGH READING ↗
- Who funds B&O RAILROAD MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds OUR MILITARY KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Immigration Outreach Service Center ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds NOLAN ROBISON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RETREAT AT BECKLEYSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAVANAGH HOUSE ↗
- Who funds 4MyCity Inc ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS CHANCE OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKFIELD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Batza Family Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Golfers' Charitable Association Inc · Kleins Shoprite of Maryland Charitable Fund Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · The RCM&D Foundation · Middendorf Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oluv C Joynor Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Talmar Inc — 46% of income from government
- Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- 4MyCity Inc — 7% of income from government
- B&o Railroad Museum Inc — 7% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Oluv C Joynor Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Oluv C Joynor Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.