Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Olson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
73
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$566k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Youth Development$6.2MAnimals$915kInternational$739kEnvironment$446kArts & Culture$406kPublic Benefit$301kEducation$207kHealth$199kOther$0
02FY2025 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $992k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $847k
  • $250k+1 grant · $566k
$25,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINGS$565,900
UKRAINE FOCUS$135,000
WILD CARE FOUNDATION$128,881
THE USA TRACK & FIELD FOUNDATION INC$123,961
Individual grant recipient$74,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$70,000
WATER 4 MERCY INC$65,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$50,000
NATIONAL COWBOY MUSEUM$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$50,000
MERCY SHIPS$50,000
BLAZE'S TRIBUTE EQUINE RESCUE$40,000
NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC$40,000
OETA FOUNDATION$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ORPHAN ACRES: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%REECE'S RAINBOW: $3k → 7%AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG: $1k → 6%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 16%WATER 4 FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $3k → 16%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $3k → 16%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $3k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING INC: $34k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING INC: $34k → 16%DAILY LIVING CENTERS: $3k → 16%DAILY LIVING CENTERS: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 63 repeat orgs$292k to everyone else

63 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
14

Total granted

$10M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+29%

Still filing today

79%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WILDCARE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $283k · revenue +191%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $187k · revenue +98%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    6× · 2017–2025 · $174k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • UH
    UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $45k · revenue +80%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • WI
    WATER4 INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
11
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
12
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Sports Booster Organi…Government Accountability R…Native Hawaiian Community D…Christian Missionary Organi…Public School District Foun…Public Library SupportPublic University Foundatio…Classical Music EnsemblesPregnancy Support ServicesChild and Family ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Health CentersLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Homeless Services & ShelterFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsSenior Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Environmental Advocacy Orga…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr13%5%5–10yr17%12%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr19%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%2%<5yr13%7%5–10yr17%8%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr19%25%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/76
the rest of the field
13%
2,509/19,346

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/73
Grantees still filing
43/73
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WINGS — $6,223,384 · OtherWINGS+54 more — $2,241,960 · Other+54 moreWILDCARE FOUNDATION — $282,881 · AnimalsWILDCARE …OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $125,000 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA …BLAZE'S TRIBUTE EQUINE RESCUE INC — $107,500 · AnimalsBLAZE'S T…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $75,715 · AnimalsBEST FRIE…Defenders of Wildlife — $54,500 · AnimalsDefenders…FREE TO LIVE INC — $51,715 · AnimalsFREE TO L…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $51,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL …OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY — $37,000 · Animals+11 more — $112,325 · Animals+11 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $187,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $167,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International — $75,000 · International+6 more — $24,000 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $174,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $37,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE — $15,000 · EnvironmentEDMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $68,000 · EducationLibrary Endowment Trust — $68,000 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation — $60,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR PRADER-WILLI RESEARCH INC — $81,000 · HealthOklahoma Medical Research Foundation — $50,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $44,000 · Health+1 more — $35 · HealthUSA TRACK AND FIELD FOUNDATION INC — $168,961 · Recreation & Sports
Other$8,465,344Animals$897,636International$453,000Environment$226,000Education$196,000Health$175,535Recreation & Sports$168,961

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILDCARE FOUNDATION — $282,881 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetUKRAINE FOCUS — $225,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $187,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $174,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUSA TRACK AND FIELD FOUNDATION INC — $168,961 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $167,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC — $163,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $125,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBLAZE'S TRIBUTE EQUINE RESCUE INC — $107,500 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR PRADER-WILLI RESEARCH INC — $81,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $75,715 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $69,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $68,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetLibrary Endowment Trust — $68,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetEDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC — $68,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetEdmond Family Counseling Inc — $68,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR A RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL BUDGET — $68,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetZero Waste Washington — $65,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $60,600 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $54,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFREE TO LIVE INC — $51,715 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $51,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC & MEMORY INC — $51,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation — $50,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEDMOND HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRUST — $50,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $44,825 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $44,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY — $37,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $37,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLOEDEL RESERVE — $30,135 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN — $18,425 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $16,425 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATER4 INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $8,425 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Fidelity Fou…Oklahoma City Communi…El and Thelma Gaylord…Kirkpatrick Foundatio…Inasmuch FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Sarkeys FoundationFred Jones Family Fou…Bowen FoundationHarris Foundation IncWegener Foundation IncThe Merrick Foundation
American Fidelity FoundationOK36.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Fidelity Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Sarkeys Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Bowen Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Olson Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Olson Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Olson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines