· Public charity
Olneyville Housing Corporation
One neighborhood builders (one/nb) is a community development organization with a mission to promote equity, public health and community safety.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $573,855 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $789,246 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $215,391 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $236k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $332k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOONASQUATUCKET RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL | $199,655 |
| RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC TRANSIT AUTHORITY | $132,000 |
| OLNEYVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION | $47,112 |
| GARDEN TIME INC | $45,892 |
| SIN-CERE MULTISERVICE INC | $27,000 |
| THE AUTISM PROJECT | $22,092 |
| AJ'S LANDSCAPING & HARDSCAPING LLC | $20,270 |
| NORTH END OUTREACH (CBAA) | $18,464 |
| PROVIDENCE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANTING PROGRAM | $15,670 |
| CENTRO DE INNOVACION MUJER LATINA - 053124 | $13,000 |
| REFUGEE DREAM CENTER | $13,000 |
| PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $13,000 |
| THE MANTON AVE PROJECT | $6,700 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE GENESIS CENTER3× · 2021–2023 · $617k · revenue +51%- PWPROJECT WEBERRENEW3× · 2021–2023 · $298k · revenue +283%
- WRWOONASQUATUCKET RIVER WATERSHED4× · 2021–2024 · $246k · revenue +230%
Funded once
- MHMount Hope Community Center Incone grant, 2022 · $72k · revenue -45%
- OJOUR JOURN3I LLCone grant, 2021 · $45k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $29k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to eliminate health disparities in rhode island and beyond. the organization develops innovative public health programs, conducts translational and policy research, provides clinical services, and trains…
The Latino Policy Institute works to stimulate public policy discourse by examining and communicating the evolving experiences of the Latino community in Rhode Island. LPI is committed to educating, activating, and motivating community…
Promoting a more equitable, economically vibrant, and environmentally sustainable food system in rhode island.
Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…
To protect women's health and reproductive choice through advocacy in rhode island.
CCCC offers physical, social, recreational, educational, and health programs to citizens of Rhode Island. CCCC provides individuals and families with the tools they need to live independent, healthy, productive, and successful lives.
Groundwork rhode island (gwri) is a community-based organization helping build healthier, more resilient, and more equitable urban communities in rhode island by improving the physical environment and creating economic opportunities for…
Promote businesses through the organization of various meetings, functions, and programs.
Advancement of fiscally responsible government, competitive tax policies, and economic opportunities for all in rhode island by providing objective and nonpartisan research and analysis.
The Center for Mediation and Collaboration Rhode Island trains, educates and mediates--empowering Rhode Islanders to resolve conflicts.
Rental assistance received from a government agency under section 8 of the housing assistance payments program. providing technical assistance and training to low-income rural communities and other agencies in order to provide or enhance…
To be a proactive advocate for the hospitals in rhode island that is capable of working for and with the hospitals to positively influence public opinion, legislative outcomes and regulatory policy. the purpose of such advocacy is to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Genesis Center and the most unlike its peers is Centro De Innovacion Mujer Latina. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GENESIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds FEDERAL HILL HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT WEBERRENEW ↗
- Who funds WOONASQUATUCKET RIVER WATERSHED ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INNOVATION STUDIO INC ↗
- Who funds THE PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Refugee Development Center ↗
- Who funds OLNEYVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEIU EDUCATION AND SUPPORT FUND ↗
- Who funds Garden Time Inc ↗
- Who funds Mount Hope Community Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Lifespan Foundation Brown University Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Autism Project ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ENTERPRISE GREENHOUSE ↗
- Who funds BUILDING FUTURES ↗
- Who funds THE MANTON AVENUE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds CLINICA ESPERANZA HOPE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF PROVIDENCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANTING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds INSPIRING MINDS ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE INNOVACION MUJER LATINA ↗
- Who funds HOPE & MAIN ↗
- Who funds YWCA RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds Community Libraries of Providence ↗
- Who funds COALITION CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · The Champlin Foundation · June Rockwell Levy Foundation Incorporated · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Centreville Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Banknewport Charitable Foundation Inc · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cvs Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Olneyville Housing Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Seiu Education and Support Fund — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.