Skip to content

· Public charity

Ohr Somayach International Inc

To support religious, charitable & educational programs and institutions

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$416k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$4.3MEducation$843kHuman Services$106kPhilanthropy$67kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $511,850, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,746,710 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,234,860 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
  • $250k+1 grant · $416k
$65,960
Median grant
2
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHR SOMAYACH NY$415,890
AM FRIENDS RABBIN COLLEGE$65,960
AM FRIENDS OF MESHECH CHOCHM$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RAJE USA INC: $24k → 20%RAJE USA INC: $23k → 20%RAJE USA INC: $21k → 20%RAJE USA INC: $15k → 20%RAJE USA INC: $12k → 20%RAJE USA INC: $7k → 20%RAJE USA INC: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $2.2M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$2.1M · 93% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: CHARIT · EDUC · EDUC.

England$161k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: EDUC.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 9 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$5.1M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-5%

Still filing today

56%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $253k · revenue +125%
  • AF
    American Friends of Meshech Chochma Ohr
    8× · 2017–2024 · $174k · revenue +281% · 92% of their budget
  • RI
    RAJE-USA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $106k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • JL
    JEWISH LEARNING EXPERIENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $57k · revenue -98% · 29% of their budget
  • CM
    CONGREGATION MENACHEM ZION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • OY
    OHR YOSEF OF ROCKLAND COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Ziv Israel Association
—
3
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Friends of Mesivta Lubavitch Toronto Inc

. A charitable and educational organization that helps bring unaffiliated Jews closer to their religion and practice by organizing Jewish studies

Religion
5
American Friends of Koll El Toras Zeraim Jerusalem Inc

Supporting the activities of Kollel Toras Zeraim Jerusalem

Religion
6
Friends of Yeshivas Rabbi Akiva

Adult education in jewish religious subjects

International
7
American Friends of Chabad Educational Center in Karmiel Inc

Support education in Israel

International
8
American Friends of Jerusalem Cheder Inc

To provide support for jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and financial support to charitable organizations enabling such entities to fulfill their charitable purpose.

Religion
9
American Friends of Yeshivat Bnei Rachel

charitable purpose of soliciting, collecting and raising money for the promotion and furtherance of Jewish religious knowledge and traditions through education, by funding scholarships covering tuition and related costs for needy students…

Philanthropy
10
Tamim Academies
Philanthropy
11
Fund for Jewish Education Inc
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Brothers Aid

To help promote orthodox jewish religious education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Rabbinical College Netiv Hadaat Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Meshech Chochma Ohr. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHR SOMAYACH NY: $3,969,595 · OtherOHR SOMAYACH NYDARCHEI YITZCHAK INC: $173,050 · OtherPULSE: $172,785 · Other+7 more: $251,127 · Other+7 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC: $252,776 · EducationUNIVERSITY JEWISH EXPERIENCE INC: $96,218 · EducationAmerican Friends of Meshech Chochma Ohr: $173,500 · InternationalRAJE-USA INC: $106,001 · Human ServicesYESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $65,960 · ReligionCONGREGATION HAMERKAZ INC: $10,000 · ReligionJEWISH CHARITY REVIEW INC: $66,667 · Philanthropy
Other$4,566,557Education$348,994International$173,500Human Services$106,001Religion$75,960Philanthropy$66,667

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC: $252,776 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Meshech Chochma Ohr: $173,500 over 8y, 92% of budgetFriends of Toras Chayim Educational Center of Ashkelon Inc: $138,850 over 6y, 62% of budgetRAJE-USA INC: $106,001 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY JEWISH EXPERIENCE INC: $96,218 over 2y, 68% of budgetJEWISH CHARITY REVIEW INC: $66,667 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetJEWISH LEARNING EXPERIENCE: $57,224 over 1y, 29% of budgetCONGREGATION HAMERKAZ INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Meshech Chochma Ohr ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Toras Chayim Educational Center of Ashkelon Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAJE-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY JEWISH EXPERIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CHARITY REVIEW INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNING EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION HAMERKAZ INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morasha Olami IncNJ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morasha Olami Inc · The Ojc Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ohr Somayach International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ohr Somayach International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ohr Somayach International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ohr Somayach International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ohr Somayach International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph