· Public charity
Morasha Olami Inc
To foster and promote awareness, understanding and strengthening of Jewish identity, culture, religion and religious studies, history, literature, and art throughout the world; (b) provide support for and conduct educational, religious, and cultural programs and activities in Jewish communities throughout the world; (c) provide support…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 121 grants below total $24,141,706 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $60,987,404 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $36,845,698 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $85k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $974k
- $50k–250k40 grants · $4.5M
- $250k+28 grants · $19M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEOR | $1,836,981 |
| Jewish Enrichment Center | $1,727,059 |
| Federation of Jewish communit | $1,487,540 |
| Torah Links of Lakewood | $1,097,717 |
| Jewish Unity International | $949,051 |
| FJC | $931,628 |
| The Afikim Foundation | $912,329 |
| ACLIBA | $796,735 |
| EMET | $686,087 |
| MEOR INC | $664,719 |
| Beth Medrash Govoha TorahLin | $647,057 |
| Rutgers Jewish Xperience | $620,203 |
| shor yoshuv | $566,508 |
| JUDAICASITE INC | $549,354 |
| Shaarei Emunah | $442,505 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $37M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 16 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Local Charities
Stated purpose: Local Charities
Stated purpose: Local Charities
Stated purpose: Local Charities
Stated purpose: Local Charities
Stated purpose: Local Charities
Stated purpose: Local Charities
Stated purpose: Local Charities
Stated purpose: Local Charities
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
138 repeat relationships — 78 still active in FY2024, 60 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMEOR INC8× · 2017–2024 · $17M · revenue +13% · 51% of their budget
- JUJewish Unity International Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $7.3M · revenue +115% · 95% of their budget
- BMBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC8× · 2017–2024 · $7.1M · revenue +15% · 36% of their budget
Funded once
- TTTransfer to Mosaic Unitedone grant, 2022 · $3.8M
- RJRutgers Jewish Xperience Rutone grant, 2023 · $478k
- BMBeth Medrash Gavoha Lakewoodone grant, 2023 · $408k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
publish religious books
Jewish traditions and heritage enlightment, vocational education
To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment
Support of religious schools in Israel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jerusalem Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meor of Boston Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEOR INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Unity International Inc ↗
- Who funds BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds THE AFIKIM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMET OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds JUDAICASITE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF JEWS ↗
- Who funds Yehudi Inc ↗
- Who funds JFT - JEWISH FUTURES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASHREINU CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds OHR SOMAYACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ACILBA 613 ↗
- Who funds SPARKS OF DAAS INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Arizonans on Campus ↗
- Who funds MEOR OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF COLLEGIO MAIMONIDES ↗
- Who funds RAJE-USA INC ↗
- Who funds TORAH LINKS OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BMG STUDENT AID FUND ↗
- Who funds Rutgers Learning Network Inc ↗
- Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
- Who funds VAAD L 'HATZOLAS NIDCHEI YISROEL INC ↗
- Who funds THE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
- Who funds THE JAVNE FUND co ODONOGHUE & LAMB CPAS PLLC ↗
- Who funds AISH GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds DERECH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Jmg Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Unity International Inc · Jewish Federation of Cleveland
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Morasha Olami Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Yehudi Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Aleph Institute Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Morasha Olami Inc?
Find your warmest path to Morasha Olami Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.