Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ogc Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$876k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.4MFood & Nutrition$859kPublic Benefit$400kEnvironment$274kYouth Development$255kHealth$165kCivil Rights$165kReligion$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $570k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$70,176
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION$250,000
HOOVER FOUNDATION$200,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD$100,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$100,000
STANWICH CHURCH$70,176
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK$25,750
YALE HEALTH CENTER$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Army Ranger Lead The Way Fund: $500 → 6%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%Army Ranger Lead The Way Fund: $1k → 6%SAFE HORIZON: $10k → 17%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $26k → 14%PITCH YOUR PEERS: $1k → 9%PITCH YOUR PEERS: $1k → 9%PITCH YOUR PEERS: $1k → 9%PITCH YOUR PEERS: $1k → 9%Pitch your Peers: $1k → 9%PITCH YOUR PEERS: $1k → 9%PITCH YOUR PEERS: $1k → 9%MOTHERS FOR OTHERS: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
OH
NJ
CT
CA
VA
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Ogc Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 15% of the giving stays in CT; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ogc Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 23 repeat orgs$449k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
29

Total granted

$4.3M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+3%

Still filing today

74%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +67%
  • HF
    HOOVER FOUNDATION INCOME ACCOUNT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +75%
  • EU
    Emory University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $275k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS
    one grant, 2017 · $165k
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -8%
  • Q
    QuestBridge
    one grant, 2017 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
8
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
11
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
12
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hoover Foundation Income Account. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersYouth Development CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Education Equity LeadershipUnited Way FederationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsGovernment Accountability R…Veteran Support ServicesCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%78%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/35
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $1,833,900 · EducationChildren of Fallen Patriots FoundationEmory University — $275,000 · EducationEmory UniversitySTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $250,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION+3 more — $50,000 · EducationHOOVER FOUNDATION INCOME ACCOUNT — $400,000 · OtherHOOVER FOUNDATION INCOME ACCOUN…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC — $210,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD I…CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS — $165,000 · OtherCHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTSIndividual grant recipient — $150,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTANWICH CHURCH — $70,176 · OtherSTANWICH CHURCHTEAM IMPACT INC — $45,000 · Other+28 more — $272,350 · Other+28 moreFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $774,050 · Food & NutritionFOOD ALLERGY RESEA…END ALLERGIES TOGETHER INC — $65,000 · Arts & CultureB CURED INC — $42,088 · HealthDEGREGORIO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $2,000 · Health+4 more — $3,275 · HealthSASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC — $25,750 · Human ServicesSAFE HORIZON INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesPitch Your Peers Inc — $7,050 · Human ServicesMOTHERS FOR OTHERS INC — $5,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,510 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE INC — $50,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$2,408,900Other$1,313,026Food & Nutrition$774,050Arts & Culture$65,000Health$50,363Human Services$50,310Crime & Legal$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $1,833,900 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $774,050 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetHOOVER FOUNDATION INCOME ACCOUNT — $400,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetEmory University — $275,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC — $210,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetEND ALLERGIES TOGETHER INC — $65,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCOUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetB CURED INC — $42,088 over 4y, 12% of budgetSASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC — $25,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANGELINK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPitch Your Peers Inc — $7,050 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetMercy Corps — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE SCHOLARS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEGREGORIO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEAD THE WAY FUND INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC — $1,275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $1,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST SERVE BRIDGEPORT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWILLIAM RAVEIS CHARITABLE FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ogc Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 17%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc17% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ogc Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ogc Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph