Skip to content

· Private foundation

Obx Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$962k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$2.0MEducation$453kHealth$409kEnvironment$180kArts & Culture$71kCrime & Legal$60kCivil Rights$60kCommunity Improvement$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $238k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $167k
  • $250k+1 grant · $550k
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD CHARITABLE - THE DECISIVE$550,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$100,000
SALISBURY SCHOOL$67,000
SALISBURY SCHOOL$48,000
COMMITTEE TO UNLEASH PROSPERITY$30,000
THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE$30,000
FREEDOM FOUNDATION$25,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE - THE DECISIVE$25,000
SALISBURY SCHOOL$20,000
TURQOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION US$10,000
TURQOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION US$10,000
NASHVILLE SYMPHONY$10,000
BETHESDA BY THE SEA$10,000
FREEDOM FOUNDATION$10,000
PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TURNING POINT USA: $300k → 11%PRAGER UNIVERSITY: $200k → 14%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $190k → 17%ACU FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%CONSEVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%SALISBURY SCHOOL: $67k → 9%YALE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%VANGUARD CHARITABLE - THE DECISIVE: $550k → 7%PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%N I L R R: $25k → 6%STAND FOUNDATION: $65k → 12%INDEPENDENT WOMENS FORUM: $45k → 16%COMMITTEE TO UNLEASH PROSPERITY: $30k → 8%TURNING POINT USA: $225k → 11%PRAGER UNIVERSITY: $75k → 14%NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE: $100k → 6%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $168k → 17%CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%THE SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS: $25k → 11%SALISBURY SCHOOL: $65k → 9%VANGUARD CHARITABLE - THE DECISIVE: $25k → 7%PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%STAND: $60k → 12%INDEPENDENT WOMENS FORUM: $25k → 16%COMMITTEE TO UNLEASH PROSPERITY: $25k → 8%TURNING POINT FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%PRAGER UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE: $50k → 6%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $100k → 17%PALM BEACH DAY SCHOOL: $20k → 11%SALISBURY SCHOOL: $48k → 9%STAND: $50k → 12%COMMITTEE TO UNLEASH PROSPERITY: $25k → 8%TURNING POINT USA: $50k → 11%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50k → 17%SALISBURY SCHOOL: $20k → 9%STAND FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%TURNING POINT USA: $50k → 11%BLEXIT: $50k → 14%TURNING POINT FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%CANCER RESEARCH: $25k → 17%BLEXIT: $50k → 14%EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $20k → 14%YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY FOUNDAT: $50k → 17%THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE: $34k → 17%THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE: $30k → 17%THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE: $30k → 17%THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
IN
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 23 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
38

Total granted

$3.2M
$516k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+24%

Still filing today

57%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $607k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitCivil RightsHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $625k · revenue +107%
  • SS
    SALISBURY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +24%
  • MI
    MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $124k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • TP
    TURNING POINT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • DH
    DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -19%
  • YA
    YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
4
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
9
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
10
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Nashville Ballet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
28/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TURNING POINT USA INC: $625,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCVANGUARD CHARITABLE - THE DECISIVE: $575,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE - THE DECISIVEPRAGER UNIVERSITY: $325,000 · OtherPRAGER UNIVERSITYFREEDOM FOUNDATION: $225,000 · OtherFREEDOM FOUNDATIONS T A N D: $210,000 · OtherS T A N DSTAND FOUNDATION: $175,000 · OtherSTAND FOUNDATIONTURNING POINT FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherBLEXIT: $100,000 · Other+32 more: $444,330 · Other+32 moreCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $508,425 · HealthCANCER RESEAR…+1 more: $1,500 · HealthSALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $200,000 · EducationSALISBURY …Conservative Partnership Institute: $125,000 · EducationConservati…EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $22,500 · EducationEPISCOPAL …HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $13,500 · Education+6 more: $36,500 · Education+6 moreMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $124,000 · Public BenefitUNLEASH PROSPERITY INC: $80,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: $10,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit+2 more: $7,000 · Public BenefitTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $180,000 · EnvironmentNASHVILLE BALLET: $32,500 · Arts & CultureThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNashville Symphony Association: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: $12,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureIndependent Women's Forum: $70,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $10,000 · Civil RightsCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,829,330Health$509,925Education$397,500Public Benefit$231,000Environment$180,000Arts & Culture$93,000Civil Rights$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $625,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $508,425 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $180,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute: $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $124,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNLEASH PROSPERITY INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetIndependent Women's Forum: $70,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNASHVILLE BALLET: $32,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $22,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNashville Symphony Association: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE ZOO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN VALE SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNLEASH PROSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Independent Women's Forum ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE BALLET ↗
  • Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds TURQUOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION (US) ↗
  • Who funds Nashville Symphony Association ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oliver R Grace Charitable FoundationFL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oliver R Grace Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · John E Rovensky Charitable Trust 6388 F/K/A Ud Je Rovensky 2/28/89 Fdn · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Obx Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Obx Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Martin County: 2% of income from government
  • Palm Beach Day Academy Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Obx Inc?

Find your warmest path to Obx Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Obx’s filings →

More from the funding graph