Skip to content
Northwest Community Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Northwest Community Hospital

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL follows the mission of Endeavor Health (F/K/A NS-EE Holdings).

$310k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$170kHealth$136kHousing & Shelter$33kRecreation & Sports$23kCrime & Legal$22kEducation$14kFood & Nutrition$8k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $108,307, the rows itemized in this filing. The $310,221 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $201,914 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$522M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCHC Service Corporation$35,017
St Mary's Services$10,000
WINGS Program Inc$10,000
Lemons of Love Inc$10,000
Bridge Youth and Family Services$10,000
Northwest Center Against Sexual Assault$10,000
Journeys-The Road Home$10,000
Little City Foundation$7,790
Palatine Township Senior Citizens Council$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%St Mary's Services: $10k → 14%JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 14%Journeys-The Road Home: $10k → 14%St Mary's Services: $10k → 14%Partners for Our Communities: $9k → 14%Partners for Our Communities: $8k → 14%Partners for Our Communities: $8k → 14%St Mary's Service: $8k → 14%Partners for Our Communities: $7k → 14%WINGS: $8k → 14%St Mary's Service: $7k → 14%Partners for Our Communities: $6k → 14%WINGS: $8k → 14%Palatine Township Senior Citizens Council: $6k → 14%St Mary's Service: $18k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 11 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$290k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+224%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARYS SERVICES
    5× · 2018–2024 · $52k · revenue +51%
  • SI
    SHELTER INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $39k · revenue +257%
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR OUR COMMUNITIES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $37k · revenue +220%

Funded once

  • WR
    WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • SC
    Swedish Covenant Hospital Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +224%
  • WR
    WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
2
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

—
3
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
4
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
5
Pillars Community Health

Pillars community health provides health, social, and educational services to build strong, healthy communities.

Health
6
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
7
Casa Central Social Services Corporation

Casa central drives change by empowering individuals and families to thrive - delivering impactful services that transform lives and uplift communities.

Human Services
8
Northwest Community Healthcare

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

Health
9
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
10
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
11
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kenneth Young Center; the most unlike its peers is Childrens Advocacy Center of Collin County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARYS SERVICES: $52,250 · Human ServicesST MARYS SERVICESPARTNERS FOR OUR COMMUNITIES: $37,175 · Human ServicesPARTNERS FOR OUR COMMUNITIESASCEND DALLAS: $30,750 · Human ServicesASCEND DALLASPADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME: $20,000 · Human ServicesPADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOMEPALATINE TOWNSHIP SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $5,500 · Human ServicesSPECIAL LEISURE SERVICES FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherSPECIAL LEISURE SERVICES F…KENNETH YOUNG CENTER: $14,750 · OtherKENNETH YOUNG CENTERCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago: $14,000 · OtherCatholic Charities of the …WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE: $13,500 · OtherWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLL…NORTHWEST CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT: $10,000 · OtherNORTHWEST CENTER AGAINST S…THE BRIDGE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE YOUTH AND FAMIL…AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES: $7,790 · OtherAMERICAN FEDERATION OF STA…ARLINGTON HEIGHTS PARK DISTRICT: $5,417 · OtherARLINGTON HEIGHTS PARK DIS…MCHC CHICAGO HOSPITAL COUNCIL: $35,017 · HealthMCHC CHICAGO HOSPITAL C…GREATER FAMILY HEALTH: $29,775 · HealthGREATER FAMILY HEALTHSwedish Covenant Hospital Foundation: $10,000 · HealthSwedish Covenant Hospit…LEMONS OF LOVE INC: $10,000 · HealthLEMONS OF LOVE INCSHELTER INC: $39,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER INCWINGS PROGRAM INC: $23,000 · Housing & ShelterWINGS PROGRAM INCCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $12,000 · Civil RightsWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Education
Human Services$145,675Other$92,957Health$84,792Housing & Shelter$62,000Civil Rights$12,000Education$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MARYS SERVICES: $52,250 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSHELTER INC: $39,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS FOR OUR COMMUNITIES: $37,175 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMCHC CHICAGO HOSPITAL COUNCIL: $35,017 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASCEND DALLAS: $30,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER FAMILY HEALTH: $29,775 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL LEISURE SERVICES FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetKENNETH YOUNG CENTER: $14,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSwedish Covenant Hospital Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BRIDGE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALATINE TOWNSHIP SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $5,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rotary Club of Palati…United Way of Metropo…Motorola Solutions Fo…Rotary Club of Schaum…AbbVie FoundationThe FJK Private Found…Endeavor Health Clini…John Marshall Family …George M Eisenberg Fo…The Chicago Community…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…The Bank of America C…
Rotary Club of Palatine FoundationIL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rotary Club of Palatine Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Rotary Club of Schaumburg Hoffman Estates Charitable Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The FJK Private Foundation · Endeavor Health Clinical Operations · John Marshall Family Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · The Chicago Community Trust · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Northwest Community Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northwest Community Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Northwest Community Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home