Skip to content

· Community foundation

Northpoint Foundation Inc

The foundation will conduct charitable activities designed to improve the quality of life in the community by increasing charitable giving and community participation.

$802k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$647kEducation$485kYouth Development$360kFood & Nutrition$261kHuman Services$230kRecreation & Sports$208kHealth$204kHousing & Shelter$122kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $318,324, the rows itemized in this filing. The $802,299 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $483,975 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $196k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $113k
$18,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$386k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA'S HELPERS INC$63,446
FIRE FOUNDATION$50,000
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$38,229
STS JOACHIM & ANN CARE SERVICE$25,486
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK$23,000
LEAD TO READ INC$18,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC$15,000
THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC$15,000
THE HOPE CENTER$15,000
SLEEP TIGHT KIDS INC$10,451
BAGS OF HOPE INC$10,451
FREEDOM HOOPS$9,261
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $50k → 11%MIMI'S PANTRY: $10k → 8%SLEEP TIGHT KIDS INC: $10k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $60k → 8%CODY ROUGE COMMUNITY ACTION ALLIANCE: $50k → 21%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $30k → 8%THE HOPE CENTER: $15k → 15%URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
OH
PA
CA
UT
MO
KS
NC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 39% of Northpoint Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 36%.

Northpoint Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 13 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
37

Total granted

$1.9M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $405k · revenue +42%
  • TG
    THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $389k · revenue +132%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR INCLUSIVE RELIGIOUS EDUCATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • MY
    MIDWAY YOUTH SUPPORT ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2021 · $90k · revenue -21% · 99% of their budget
  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $90k · revenue +10%
  • VO
    VARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8graduated
    one grant, 2021 · $87k · revenue +99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Kidvantage

KidVantage helps kids be safe, nourished, and healthy by providing diapers, formula, car seats, clothing, and more. KidVantage protects and promotes healthy development for kids (through age 12) by collecting, purchasing, and distributing…

Human Services
3
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
4
Children First Ceo Kansas Inc

Assist low income students to succeed in school

Education
5
Hope Leadership Academy

To provide a world-class neighborhood school whose students excel in a culture of academic rigor, character development, and caring relationships.

Education
6
City Academy Inc

See schedule o.city academy transforms children, families and our community through exceptional education and bold expectations that empower children to overcome barriers.

Education
7
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
8
Kids Win Missouri

Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…

Human Services
9
Junior Achievement of Kansas Inc

To encourage, promote, supervise, and develop educational programs designed to give youths experience in industry and business by making it possible for them to learn by doing, to provide them with an opportunity to learn about the…

International
10
Feed the Kids Columbus Inc

Feed The Kids Columbus strives to ensure food insecure children in Central Ohio have access to nutritious meals and snacks so they are able to learn and grow. There are as many as 12 million children in the United States who are at risk of…

Food & Nutrition
11
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
12
Love Fund for Children Inc

The love fund for children bridges the gap in youth services by partnering with advocates to fulfill unique, unmet needs of children across kansas city.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fraternal Order of Police Joliet Lodge # 58. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
29/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Santa's Helpers: $237,995 · OtherSanta's HelpersMIDWAY YOUTH SUPPORT ORGANIZATION: $90,000 · OtherMIDWAY YOUTH SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONSTS JOACHIM AND ANN CARE SERVICE: $87,921 · OtherSTS JOACHIM AND ANN CARE SERVICEST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $37,000 · OtherST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $106,005 · OtherST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONDream On 3: $65,000 · OtherDream On 3IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $50,000 · OtherGLOBAL FC: $60,000 · OtherGLOBAL FC+21 more: $337,654 · Other+21 moreTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $388,550 · PhilanthropyTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PR…VARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8: $87,000 · PhilanthropyVARIETY OF GREATER K…NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyNEW CANAAN COMMUNITY…DAVIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $37,000 · PhilanthropyDAVIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $405,267 · InternationalFEED MY STARVI…KC INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY: $156,662 · EducationKC INTERNATION…Cincinnati Youth Collaborative: $79,000 · EducationCincinnati You…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $62,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR…KANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $61,936 · EducationKANSAS CITY GI…BELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $16,228 · Education+2 more: $12,260 · EducationFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $90,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUP…VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOU…Cody Rouge Community Action Alliance: $50,000 · Human ServicesCody Rouge…LEAD TO READ INC: $44,000 · Human ServicesLEAD TO RE…SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC: $21,283 · Human ServicesSHOES 4 TH…THE HOPE CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSLEEP TIGHT KIDS INC: $10,451 · Human ServicesMIMIS PANTRY: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,007 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR INCLUSIVE RELIGIOUS EDUCATION INC: $200,000 · ReligionHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $90,000 · Food & NutritionINTERFAITH FOOD ALLIANCE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionBAGS OF HOPE: $10,451 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,071,575Philanthropy$552,550International$405,267Education$388,086Human Services$295,741Religion$200,000Food & Nutrition$172,451

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $405,267 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $388,550 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSanta's Helpers: $237,995 over 4y, 86% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INCLUSIVE RELIGIOUS EDUCATION INC: $200,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetKC INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY: $156,662 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $106,005 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $90,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetMIDWAY YOUTH SUPPORT ORGANIZATION: $90,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTS JOACHIM AND ANN CARE SERVICE: $87,921 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCincinnati Youth Collaborative: $79,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetDream On 3: $65,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $62,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $61,936 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGLOBAL FC: $60,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCody Rouge Community Action Alliance: $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLEAD TO READ INC: $44,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetNEW CANAAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDAVIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK: $23,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC: $21,283 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHabitat For Humanity of Bucks County Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetProKids: $18,822 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARYLAND HEIGHTS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17,500 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetBELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $16,228 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDEPENDENCE FOUNDATION INC: $15,010 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGeorge Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLIFT UP CAROLINAS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF KCKS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION JOLIET: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP TIGHT KIDS INC: $10,451 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE JOLIET LODGE # 58: $10,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetUNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY NORTHERN MINIATURE RAILROAD COMPANY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMIMIS PANTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOutreach North Academy: $7,111 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetIMMANUEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $5,149 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MO: $5,007 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO21.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Turner Construction Company Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Servant Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Northpoint Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northpoint Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Northpoint’s filings →

    More from the funding graph