· Community foundation
Northpoint Foundation Inc
The foundation will conduct charitable activities designed to improve the quality of life in the community by increasing charitable giving and community participation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $624,960 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $979,534 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $354,574 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $409k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $202k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KC INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY | $99,962 |
| FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN | $51,717 |
| FIRE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $42,776 |
| TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| INTERFAITH FOOD ALLIANCE | $30,000 |
| FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER | $30,000 |
| CINCINNATI YOUTH COLLABORATIVE | $30,000 |
| LEAD TO READ INC | $26,000 |
| STS JOACHIM & ANN CARE SERVICE | $25,552 |
| SANTA'S HELPERS INC | $25,552 |
| SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS | $21,283 |
| SHOAL CREEK GOLF COURSE | $20,799 |
| DREAM ON 3 | $15,000 |
| GEORGE WERDEN BUCK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 39% of Northpoint Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 36% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $297k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FMFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC4× · 2020–2024 · $405k · revenue +42%
- TGTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC3× · 2020–2022 · $374k · revenue +132%
- KIKC INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY2× · 2023–2024 · $157k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- HTHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORKone grant, 2020 · $90k · revenue +10%
- MYMIDWAY YOUTH SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONone grant, 2021 · $90k · revenue -21% · 99% of their budget
- VOVARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8graduatedone grant, 2021 · $87k · revenue +99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.
See schedule o.city academy transforms children, families and our community through exceptional education and bold expectations that empower children to overcome barriers.
To encourage, promote, supervise, and develop educational programs designed to give youths experience in industry and business by making it possible for them to learn by doing, to provide them with an opportunity to learn about the…
Assist low income students to succeed in school
KidVantage helps kids be safe, nourished, and healthy by providing diapers, formula, car seats, clothing, and more. KidVantage protects and promotes healthy development for kids (through age 12) by collecting, purchasing, and distributing…
Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…
To feed the hungry by soliciting and receiving food and other goods from local, regional and national food companies and other enterprises
To provide a world-class neighborhood school whose students excel in a culture of academic rigor, character development, and caring relationships.
Friends of the children - chicago has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…
We believe that food is a human right and that food has the power to bring people together. Our vision is to build a stronger, healthier, and hunger-free Coralville community. Powered by community support, the Coralville Community Food…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Global Fc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Santa's Helpers ↗
- Who funds KC INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INCLUSIVE RELIGIOUS EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MIDWAY YOUTH SUPPORT ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds VARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8 ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ↗
- Who funds Dream On 3 ↗
- Who funds STS JOACHIM AND ANN CARE SERVICE ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FC ↗
- Who funds IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC ↗
- Who funds Cody Rouge Community Action Alliance ↗
- Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds DAVIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ICARE VILLAGE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEAD TO READ INC ↗
- Who funds SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat For Humanity of Bucks County Inc ↗
- Who funds ProKids ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND HEIGHTS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds BELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDEPENDENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION JOLIET ↗
- Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club ↗
- Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds LIFT UP CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF KCKS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Turner Construction Company Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Servant Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Northpoint Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.