Skip to content

· Public charity

North Central Health Services Inc

The organization is committed to advancing and providing health care for the benefit of the citizens of its eight county service area.

$16M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$26MYouth Development$9.1MEnvironment$6.8MHousing & Shelter$4.3MHuman Services$4.1MEducation$2.9MArts & Culture$2.7MRecreation & Sports$1.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $118k
  • $250k+4 grants · $15M
$3,264,291
Median grant
1
States reached
$540M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$7,688,286
PURDUE UNIVERSITY - HEALTH EQUITY INITIATIVES$4,000,000
MERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP$3,264,291
NICHES LAND TRUST$450,000
LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$118,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $1.3M → 9%CLINTON COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $152k → 11%MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $800k → 11%ABILITIES SERVICES INC: $145k → 11%WABASH CENTER INC: $94k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITE COUNTY: $68k → 19%YWCA GREATER LAFAYETTE: $38k → 19%TIPPECANOE COUNTY CHILD CARE: $19k → 19%AREA IV AGENCY ON AGING AND COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $108k → 19%HEARTFORD HOUSE: $6k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of North Central Health Services Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 94%.

North Central Health Services Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52M · 41 repeat orgs$6.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
26

Total granted

$52M
$5.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+36%

Still filing today

44%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $450k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WABASH RIVER ENHANCEMENT CORPORATIO ATTN STANTON LAMBERT
    4× · 2017–2023 · $6.3M · revenue +56% · 84% of their budget
  • MH
    MERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP
    3× · 2021–2024 · $4.8M · revenue +22%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $4.6M · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • YC
    YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1.3M · revenue +36%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST CENTRAL INDIANA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +375%
  • RT
    Research Triangle Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $838k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
3
Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services
4
Area Five Agency On Aging & Community Services

Area five agency on aging and community services' mission is to provide programs & services that will benefit low income, disadvantaged & older persons. we serve our mission in cass, fulton, howard, miami, tipton, and wabash counties in…

Human Services
5
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
6
Wabash County Business Alliance Inc

Together, growing a prosperous wabash county.

—
7
Tri-County Workforce Investment Board Inc

Activities of tcwib include only those specifically designated under the workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa).

Employment
8
Lincoln Hills Development Corporation

Reducing poverty to improve lives and communities in southern indiana.

Human Services
9
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
10
Community Action Program Inc of Western Indiana

To Develop and Provide resources for the purpose of assisting Low-Income Individuals through a variety of programs in Benton, Fountain, Montgomery, Parke, Vermillion, And Warren Counties in Indiana.

Human Services
11
Tecumseh Area Partnership Inc

Employment and training services

Employment
12
Community Action of East Central Indiana

To provide education and assistance to low income, disadvantaged individuals and children.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is White County Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
34/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Indiana University School of Medicine: $10,788,393 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $5,242,886 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYEDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $1,247,000 · OtherTIPPECANOE SCHOOL CORPORATION: $1,143,813 · OtherNORTHWEST CENTRAL INDIANA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS INC: $1,000,000 · Other+41 more: $9,057,717 · Other+41 moreMERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP: $4,816,099 · HealthMERIDIAN HEALTH SE…COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $4,616,900 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH N…+3 more: $301,867 · HealthWABASH RIVER ENHANCEMENT CORPORATIO ATTN STANTON LAMBERT: $6,323,190 · EnvironmentWABASH RIVER…NICHES LAND TRUST INC: $450,000 · EnvironmentNICHES LAND …WABASH CENTER INC: $2,810,199 · Human ServicesWABASH CEN…YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $1,250,000 · Human ServicesYMCA CAMP …MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $800,010 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY…+8 more: $623,799 · Human Services+8 moreLAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC: $3,697,650 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $49,000 · Housing & ShelterIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $2,912,552 · EducationCROSSING NATIONAL INC: $153,904 · EducationTHE ARTS FEDERATION INC: $2,440,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $248,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$28,479,809Health$9,734,866Environment$6,773,190Human Services$5,484,008Housing & Shelter$3,746,650Education$3,066,456Arts & Culture$2,688,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWABASH RIVER ENHANCEMENT CORPORATIO ATTN STANTON LAMBERT: $6,323,190 over 4y, 84% of budgetMERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP: $4,816,099 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $4,616,900 over 4y, 21% of budgetLAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC: $3,697,650 over 3y, 11% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $2,912,552 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetWABASH CENTER INC: $2,810,199 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE ARTS FEDERATION INC: $2,440,000 over 6y, 52% of budgetYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $1,250,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetEDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $1,247,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $838,206 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $800,818 over 1y, 17% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $800,010 over 1y, 73% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAGAMORE COUNCIL 162: $647,275 over 3y, 23% of budgetLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $539,650 over 6y, 17% of budgetGREATER LAFAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $510,282 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetNICHES LAND TRUST INC: $450,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $248,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA WABASH VALLEY REGION INC: $216,828 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetWHITE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $162,796 over 2y, 48% of budgetCROSSING NATIONAL INC: $153,904 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCORE Community Center: $152,321 over 1y, 16% of budgetAbilities Services Inc: $145,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $112,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAREA IV AGENCY ON AGING AND COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC: $107,846 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $74,498 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetBAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $71,802 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWHITE COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $67,502 over 1y, 12% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $64,999 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA RURAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $60,040 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHOME WITH HOPE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF: $43,266 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $38,160 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRIGGS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $24,999 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCARROLL COUNTY WABASH & ERIE CANAL: $24,999 over 1y, 14% of budgetHANNA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $24,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetHeartford House Inc: $21,712 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetTIPPECANOE COUNTY CHILD CARE INC: $19,456 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WABASH RIVER ENHANCEMENT CORPORATIO ATTN STANTON LAMBERT ↗
  • Who funds MERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WABASH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTS FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CENTRAL INDIANA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAGAMORE COUNCIL 162 ↗
  • Who funds Greater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LAFAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NICHES LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA WABASH VALLEY REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSING NATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CORE Community Center ↗
  • Who funds Abilities Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater LafayetteIN61.6× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Lafayette · Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · Northwest Central Indiana Community Partnerships Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Indiana University Health Arnett Inc · Community Foundation of Howard County · Sia Foundation Inc · Arconic Foundation · James K and Mary Jo Risk Family Foundation Inc · Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation · Montgomery County Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North Central Health Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Central Health Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 65%
  • Education Development Center Inc: 65% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to North Central Health Services Inc?

Find your warmest path to North Central Health Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on North Central Health Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph