Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

North Bay Association of Realtors Charity

No formal mission statement adopted.

$82k
Granted FY2021
4
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Youth Development$47kPublic Safety & Disaster$47kFood & Nutrition$24kHousing & Shelter$20kHuman Services$19kEmployment$10kEducation$8k
02FY2021 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $37,013 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $81,763 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,750 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$144k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ceres$10,000
Community Action of Napa Vall$10,000
Community Action Partnership$10,000
Community Action of Napa Vall$7,013
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%On the Move: $34k → 9%Voices: $13k → 9%Community Action of Napa Vall: $10k → 9%Community Action of Napa Vall: $7k → 9%Ceres: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transportation Alternatives for Marin
Public Benefit
2
Rebuild North Bay

Rebuild northbay is dedicated to the long term rebuilding of the region through advocacy, coordination and collaboration. we seek to ensure our community emerges from disaster better, safer, greener, and faster. our tagline is recover,…

Community Improvement
3
Vna Health

Vna health provides home health and hospice services to patients in santa barbara and the surrounding area.

Health
4
Sonoma Botanical Garden
5
San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California

The non-profit housing association of northern california is the collective voice of those who support, build and finance affordable housing. nph promotes the proven methods of the non-profit sector and focuses government policy on housing…

Housing & Shelter
7
Homes for California Dba Homes for Sonoma

Homes for Sonoma is a nonprofit developer creating quality workforce housing options that support safe and sustainable community, and finds efficient, scalable solutions to address the housing crisis in Sonoma County and throughout…

Housing & Shelter
8
Northern Solano County Association of Realtors

A real estate trade association supporting realtors in northern solano county, california.

Community Improvement
9
Community Foundation of the Napa Valley

To mobilize resources, promote philanthropy and provide leadership on vital community issues in napa county. we look for charitable projects that make a lasting difference. we commit our resources to these projects, and inspire others to…

Philanthropy
10
California Association of Nonprofits

Calnonprofits, the leading policy voice for california's nonprofit sector, focuses on advocacy, education, and research to build a more powerful and politically engaged nonprofit network across california.

Philanthropy
11
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
12
Nuestra Casa de East Palo Alto

Nuestra Casa exists to uplift Latino families in East Palo Alto and the mid-peninsula through community education, leadership and advocacy

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County and the most unlike its peers is A Christmas for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ON THE MOVE — $47,475 · Human ServicesON THE MOVECOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY — $17,013 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEYTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECTNORTH BAY ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS — $41,999 · OtherNORTH BAY ASSOCIATION OF REALTORSFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $7,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHA CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS — $6,000 · OtherA CHRISTMAS FOR KIDSSIERRA NORTH VALLEY REALTORS — $5,000 · OtherSIERRA NORTH VALLEY REALTORSCareer Technical Education Foundation Sonoma County — $10,000 · EducationCareer Tech…PETALUMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $8,000 · EducationPETALUMA ED…THE PATHWAY HOME INC — $13,230 · HealthCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$74,488Other$59,999Education$18,000Health$13,230Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetON THE MOVE — $47,475 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH BAY ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS — $41,999 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY — $17,013 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PATHWAY HOME INC — $13,230 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCareer Technical Education Foundation Sonoma County — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPETALUMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetA CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS — $6,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · St Joseph Health System Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization North Bay Association of Realtors Charity funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to North Bay Association of Realtors Charity?

    Find your warmest path to North Bay Association of Realtors Charity through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $31k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph