Skip to content
Norman E Alexander Family S Foundation Inc C/O R Mittenthal Tcc Group at a glance

· Private foundation

Norman E Alexander Family S Foundation Inc C/O R Mittenthal Tcc Group

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$10MEnvironment$3.6MInternational$3.5MCivil Rights$3.4MHealth$3.4MHuman Services$1.7MReligion$1.6MCommunity Improvement$780kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k31 grants · $4.0M
  • $250k+10 grants · $9.0M
$200,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$124M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA - FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$4,970,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$800,000
HIAS INC$600,000
LARCHMONT TEMPLE$500,000
DOROT INC$450,000
METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL$400,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$400,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$340,000
COALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS$250,000
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$250,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED$200,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS$200,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US$200,000
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC$200,000
JEWISH VOTER RESOURCE CENTER (NEW VENTURE FUND)$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FMW NONPROFIT SOLUTIONS: $30k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $150k → 10%Jewish Family Service of San Diego: $100k → 11%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $75k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $120k → 10%LONG ISLAND CARES: $75k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $50k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $100k → 10%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $35k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $150k → 14%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $175k → 17%DOROT INC: $450k → 17%DOROT INC: $100k → 17%DOROT INC: $75k → 17%DOROT: $70k → 17%DOROT: $65k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26M · 35 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
30

Total granted

$26M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+29%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $9.9M · revenue +27%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +48%
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -51%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
3
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
11
Jews for Racial and Economic Justice Action Inc

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…

—
12
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Met Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
42/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,945,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF J…+3 more: $435,000 · PhilanthropyMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL: $750,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDI…Met Council Inc: $600,000 · OtherMet Council IncJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $575,000 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY …LARCHMONT TEMPLE INC: $500,000 · OtherLARCHMONT TEMPLE INCHADASSAH: $405,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $310,000 · OtherMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $300,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR JEWISH HISTORY INC: $300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $475,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN…NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $800,000 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH W…Humane World for Animals Inc: $515,000 · OtherHumane World for Animals Inc+24 more: $2,325,000 · Other+24 moreHIAS INC: $1,580,000 · InternationalHIAS INCAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $750,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEW…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $385,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERG…RAINFOREST TRUST: $200,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST T…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $200,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRI…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $200,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF T…+4 more: $190,000 · International+4 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,396,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $670,000 · HealthBLOOD CANC…JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $250,000 · HealthJEWISH FAM…Planned Parenthood of Illinois: $150,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $150,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $115,000 · Health+3 more: $160,000 · Health+3 moreWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $945,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILD…COALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT: $490,000 · EnvironmentCOALITION …RAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $340,000 · EnvironmentRAINFOREST…CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $320,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR …Rainforest Action Network: $200,000 · EnvironmentRainforest…California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance: $150,000 · EnvironmentHUNTINGTON BEACH WETLANDS CONSERVANCY: $150,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Environment+3 more: $165,000 · Environment+3 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,700,000 · Civil RightsJEWISH ELECTORATE INSTITUTE: $310,000 · Civil RightsPARENTS FOR PEACE: $225,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $215,000 · Civil RightsDOROT INC: $760,040 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $420,000 · Human ServicesLong Island Cares Inc: $235,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $175,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $150,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $100,000 · Human Services+1 more: $30,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$10,380,000Other$8,205,000International$3,505,000Health$2,891,000Environment$2,860,000Civil Rights$2,450,000Human Services$1,870,040

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,945,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,700,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHIAS INC: $1,580,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,396,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $945,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $800,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetDOROT INC: $760,040 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $750,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $670,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $515,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT: $490,000 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $475,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $420,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $385,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $340,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $320,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH ELECTORATE INSTITUTE: $310,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $310,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $300,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR JEWISH HISTORY INC: $300,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetJazz Foundation of America Inc: $275,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $250,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $235,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPARENTS FOR PEACE: $225,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $215,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $200,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $200,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $175,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $170,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance: $150,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $150,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHUNTINGTON BEACH WETLANDS CONSERVANCY: $150,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $150,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $115,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAZON INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $85,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundTides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY14.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norman E Alexander Family S Foundation Inc C/O R Mittenthal Tcc Group funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norman E Alexander Family S Foundation Inc C/O R Mittenthal Tcc Group. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Parents for Peace: 41% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Norman E Alexander Family S Foundation Inc C/O R Mittenthal Tcc Group?

Find your warmest path to Norman E Alexander Family S Foundation Inc C/O R Mittenthal Tcc Group through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norman E Alexander Family S Foundation Inc C/O R Mittenthal Tcc Group’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home