Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nishnabotna Valley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$26k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$61k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO$1,000
METRO COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,000
NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$1,000
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$1,000
IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO: $1k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA: $500 → 12%NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $500 → 13%WAYNE STATE COLLEGE: $500 → 13%DORDT UNIVERSITY: $500 → 8%CENTRAL COLLEGE: $500 → 8%BUENA VISTA UNIVERSITY: $500 → 10%DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 10%IOWA LAKES COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 12%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $750 → 12%IOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 13%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $1k → 15%NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY: $500 → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $500 → 20%METRO COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN: $1k → 13%DORDT UNIVERSITY: $500 → 8%DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 10%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 12%IOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 13%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $1k → 15%NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 17%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN: $500 → 13%DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $500 → 15%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 8 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$17k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+13%

Still filing today

13%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA
    4× · 2020–2024 · $3k
  • DM
    DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2k

Funded once

  • Buena Vista University
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +13%
  • Harding University Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +16%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
2
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
3
Drury University

Drury University is an independent university, church-related, grounded in the liberal arts tradition and committed to personalized education in a community of scholars who value the arts of teaching and learning. (Continued on Schedule O)

Education
4
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
5
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
6
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
7
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
10
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
11
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
12
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dordt University; the most unlike its peers is Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $3,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWADES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2,000 · OtherDES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN: $1,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLNNORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · OtherNORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITYIOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,250 · OtherIOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGEMETRO COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,000 · OtherIOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,000 · Other+7 more: $3,500 · Other+7 moreCreighton University: $1,000 · EducationCreighton UniversityMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $1,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institut…DORDT UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationDORDT UNIVERSITYBuena Vista University: $500 · EducationBuena Vista UniversityCENTRAL COLLEGE: $500 · EducationCENTRAL COLLEGENEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $500 · EducationNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIV…AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $500 · EducationAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY A…
Other$20,750Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCreighton University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBuena Vista University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarding University Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Buena Vista University ↗
  • Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marguerite V BrownWI14.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marguerite V Brown · Dean J King Family Foundation · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nishnabotna Valley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nishnabotna Valley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 26% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nishnabotna Valley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nishnabotna Valley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nishnabotna Valley’s filings →

More from the funding graph