Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dean J King Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
74
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$3.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.7MRecreation & Sports$2.3MPublic Benefit$793kArts & Culture$610kEnvironment$525kHuman Services$424kReligion$322kOther$0
02FY2025 · 74 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k42 grants · $197k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $506k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
$6,180
Median grant
6
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF LOGAN$170,000
HARRISON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIET$120,906
Individual grant recipient$118,487
CITY OF MISSOURI VALLEY$76,790
DUNLAP BETTERMENT GROUP$75,000
NEBOWA CHRISTIAN SERVICE CAMP$74,204
HARRISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR$69,432
Individual grant recipient$66,640
DUNLAP SENIOR CENTER$62,000
WOODBINE FIRE AND RESCUE$61,240
FRIENDS OF LOESS HILLS STATE PARK$58,408
Individual grant recipient$55,798
Individual grant recipient$54,085
MV YOUTH BASEBALL$49,355
LOGAN MAGNOLIA SOCCER CLUB$46,650
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DUNLAP FIRE RESCUE: $182k → 9%NEBOWA CHRISTIAN CAMP: $77k → 11%BOYER VALLEY CSD: $80k → 9%CAMP NEBOWA MARK LEONARD: $75k → 11%CITY OF DUNLAP: $77k → 9%NEBOWA CHRISTIAN SERVICE CAMP: $74k → 11%DUNLAP BETTERMENT GROUP: $75k → 9%NEBOWA CHRISTIAN CAMP: $57k → 11%DUNLAP FIRE AND RESCUE: $68k → 9%DUNLAP SENIOR CENTER: $62k → 9%LOESS HILLS STATE FOREST: $90k → 9%WOODBINE FIRE RESCUE ASSOC: $150k → 9%WOODBINE FIRE AND RESCUE: $81k → 9%HCCB: $78k → 9%CITY OF MODALE: $118k → 9%CITY OF LITTLE SIOUX: $70k → 9%CITY OF MAGNOLIA - FIRE DEPT: $68k → 9%LOGAN MAGNOLIA CSD: $173k → 9%CITY OF LOGAN: $170k → 9%LOGAN MAGNOLIA CSD: $124k → 9%CITY OF LOGAN: $95k → 9%HARRISON COUNTY 911 PHILLIP DAVIS: $91k → 9%HARRISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR: $75k → 9%HARRISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR: $69k → 9%WOODBINE FIRE AND RESCUE: $61k → 9%LITTLE SIOUX FIRE DEPARTMENT: $59k → 9%HARRISON CO FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOCIA: $56k → 9%CITY OF MONDAMIN: $200k → 9%MONDAMIN FIRE AND RESCUE: $199k → 9%CITY OF MONDAMIN: $174k → 9%WEST HARRISON CSD: $160k → 9%MONDAMIN FIRE RESCUE: $156k → 9%FRIENDS OF LOESS HILLS: $113k → 9%CITY OF MONDAMIN: $94k → 9%WEST HARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $89k → 9%CITY OF MONDAMIN: $80k → 9%CITY OF MONDAMIN: $67k → 9%WEST HARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $67k → 9%CITY OF MONDAMIN: $62k → 9%FRIENDS OF LOESS HILLS STATE PARK: $58k → 9%MISSOURI VALLEY CSD: $121k → 9%HARRISON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIET: $121k → 9%CITY OF MISSOURI VALLEY: $77k → 9%HARRISON COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATI: $60k → 9%MISSOURI VALLEY CSD: $59k → 9%CITY OF PERSIA: $67k → 9%CITY OF PERSIA: $63k → 9%CITY OF PERSIA: $61k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
SD
IA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KS
OK

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.6M · 124 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

124 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 85 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

124
153

Total granted

$9.6M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+27%

Still filing today

12%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $495k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterReligionAnimalsPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEBOWA CHRISTIAN SERVICES CAMP
    2× · 2019–2025 · $128k · revenue +165% · 56% of their budget
  • DB
    DUNLAP BETTERMENT GROUP
    2× · 2022–2025 · $79k · revenue +350% · 73% of their budget
  • HC
    HARRISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $182k
  • MF
    MONDAMIN FIRE-RESCUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $156k · revenue +89%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LOESS HILLS
    one grant, 2024 · $113k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
2
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
3
Briar Cliff University

Briar cliff university is a community committed to higher education within a liberal arts and catholic perspective. in the franciscan tradition of service, caring and openness to all, briar cliff emphasizes quality education for its…

Education
4
University of Dubuque

The university of dubuque is a private university offering undergraduate, graduate, and theological seminary degrees, and other educational opportunities with the intention of educating and forming the whole person. the university is…

Education
5
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
6
St Ambrose University

Mission statement: an inclusive, catholic, and diocesan community of learners, st. ambrose university empowers all ambrosians to act courageously, to seek wisdom through faith and reason, to work for justice, and to lead lives of service.…

Education
7
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
8
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
9
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

10
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
11
Mcmurry University

Shaped by christian principles, mcmurry university challenges students to examine our complex world from multiple perspectives in preparation for lives of leadership, service and professional success.

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland University and the most unlike its peers is Logan Youth Football Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIowa Trade AssociationsAgricultural Education & Le…Children's Health & Social …Local Economic DevelopmentYouth Development ProgramsConstruction Trade UnionsFamily Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 49. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number13%14%<5yr8%9%5–10yr11%16%10–20yr10%11%20–35yr10%14%35–55yr47%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value13%23%<5yr8%9%5–10yr11%29%10–20yr10%9%20–35yr10%9%35–55yr47%21%55yr+

The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 23% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
8%
1,476/18,823

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 312 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
16/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,121,907 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST HARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $627,480 · OtherWEST HARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOOLCITY OF LOGAN — $572,434 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $478,171 · OtherHARRISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR — $431,894 · OtherLOGAN MAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $389,902 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $383,899 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $376,234 · Other+172 more — $6,856,219 · Other+172 moreMONDAMIN FIRE-RESCUE INC — $155,500 · Public Safety & DisasterLOGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE — $24,182 · Public Safety & DisasterHarrison County Fire and Rescue — $11,911 · Public Safety & DisasterMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY — $56,730 · EducationBuena Vista University — $35,000 · EducationDORDT UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationWEST HARRISON BOOSTER CLUB — $11,447 · EducationGRACELAND UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationCORNELL COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationCreighton University — $10,000 · EducationDOANE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE — $10,000 · EducationNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $7,500 · EducationNEBOWA CHRISTIAN SERVICES CAMP — $128,304 · ReligionMERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $20,000 · ReligionDUNLAP BETTERMENT GROUP — $78,500 · Community ImprovementLOGAN YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION — $57,948 · PhilanthropyWOODBINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $19,800 · PhilanthropyHARRISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $58,880 · Animals
Other$11,238,140Public Safety & Disaster$191,593Education$190,677Religion$148,304Community Improvement$78,500Philanthropy$77,748Animals$58,880

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEBOWA CHRISTIAN SERVICES CAMP — $128,304 over 2y, 56% of budgetDUNLAP BETTERMENT GROUP — $78,500 over 2y, 73% of budgetHARRISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $58,880 over 7y, 13% of budgetLOGAN YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION — $57,948 over 3y, 54% of budgetMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY — $56,730 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY HOUSING CORPORATION — $48,800 over 3y, 21% of budgetBuena Vista University — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE — $24,182 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWoodbine Saddle Club Inc — $17,884 over 6y, 14% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CREW CENTER — $14,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWEST HARRISON BOOSTER CLUB — $11,447 over 1y, 45% of budgetGRACELAND UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOANE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIVIUM LIFE SERVICES — $5,170 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONDAMIN FIRE-RESCUE INC
  • Who funds NEBOWA CHRISTIAN SERVICES CAMP
  • Who funds DUNLAP BETTERMENT GROUP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Willard E and Ella P Thompson Educational FundIA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Willard E and Ella P Thompson Educational Fund · W D & Shirley Schafer-Ray Educational Trust · Marguerite V Brown · Iowa College Foundation · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Snyder-Vaughn Trust Funds · Gwendolyn and Lucian L Hinecker Scholarship Trust · Fahrney Education Fdtn Trust · Bestenlehner D and F Educational Tr · W E Ruebush Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dean J King Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dean J King Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dean J King Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 312 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph