Skip to content

Texas · Charitable trust

Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust

To support the efforts of charitable christian organizations that qualify as public charities.

$314k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Itemized grants FY2025
8
Organizations funded FY2024
13%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$293k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 13
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
6
Total assets, FY2025
$1.8M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 13% of the organizations Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving9$263k11%
FY20248$288k13%
FY20237$125k0%
FY20228$140k0%
FY202110$167k20%
FY202013$166kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MEducation$145kHuman Services$30k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
CA
CO
AZ
TN
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Burnham Ministries International Inc$340,000612%
Finishing Well Ministries$300,000629%
Dallas Theological Seminary$140,00060%
Denver Seminary$75,0005n/a
D O O R International$73,0006n/a
World Ministry Fellowship$72,0006n/a
The Hope Center Inc$30,00035%
Probe Ministries International$29,00032%
Campus Crusade for Christ Inc$25,0004n/a
Pioneers$22,7153n/a
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Burnham Ministries International Inc$340,000612%
Finishing Well Ministries$300,000629%
Dallas Theological Seminary$140,00060%
Denver Seminary$75,0005n/a
D O O R International$73,0006n/a
World Ministry Fellowship$72,0006n/a
The Hope Center Inc$30,00035%
Probe Ministries International$29,00032%
Campus Crusade for Christ Inc$25,0004n/a
Pioneers$22,7153n/a
Disciple Makers Network$15,00013%
Grace Community Church of Plano Inc$10,0001n/a
Women's Nonprofit Alliance$6,0001n/a
Hunters Glen Baptist Church$5,0001n/a
Beyond Ordinary Women Ministries$2,0001n/a
The Center For The Research of Early Christian Documents$2,00010%
Global Training Network Inc$2,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBurnham Ministries International Inc: $340,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetFinishing Well Ministries: $300,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $140,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hope Center Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetProbe Ministries International: $29,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetDisciple Makers Network: $15,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetThe Center For The Research of Early Christian Documents: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGlobal Training Network Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust

How much does Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust give?
Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust reported 10 itemized grants totaling $293,000, out of $314,003 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 13 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (86%), Education (11%), Human Services (2%).
Who are Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Burnham Ministries International Inc ($340k), Finishing Well Ministries ($300k), Dallas Theological Seminary ($140k).
Does Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 13% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, Servant Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust based?
Nina Jean Obel Charitable Trust is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nina Jean Obel’s filings →

More from the funding graph