Skip to content

· Private foundation

Niebla Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$445k
Granted FY2023
22
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$60k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

94% of Niebla Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 15 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Niebla Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $445k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

17
’20
16
’21
15
’22
15
’23
15
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$6.1MAnimals$561kFood & Nutrition$240kEnvironment$205kHuman Services$186kHousing & Shelter$168kArts & Culture$160kHealth$85kOther$0
02FY2023 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k19 grants · $285k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILDCARE$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
OAKLAND ZOO$50,000
INTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE$25,000
SAMARITAN HOUSE$25,000
MARINE MAMMAL CENTER$25,000
RAVENSWOOD FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$25,000
COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER$25,000
SECOND HARVEST$20,000
PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
HIDDEN VILLA$10,000
SF SPCA$10,000
KQED$10,000
LINDSAY WILDLIFE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $15k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $15k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $15k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $13k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $13k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 24 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$1.8M
$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+570%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $180k · revenue +59%
  • L
    LIFEMOVES
    4× · 2020–2023 · $115k · revenue +77%
  • TM
    THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • GG
    Golden Gate Bird Alliance Prev Golden Gate Audubon Society Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +570%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Peninsula Humane Society & Spca

The peninsula humane society & spca, guided by the humane ethic, builds healthy relationships between people and animals.

Animals
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
7
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
8
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
9
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
10
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
11
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
12
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifemoves; the most unlike its peers is Community Service Agency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
19/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $6,070,078 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCIndividual grant recipient: $167,500 · OtherIndividual gra…SECOND HARVEST: $150,000 · OtherSECOND HARVESTLIFEMOVES: $115,000 · OtherLIFEMOVESWILDCARE: $95,000 · OtherWILDCARESAMARITAN HOUSE: $95,000 · OtherSAMARITAN HOUS…RAVENSWOOD FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $85,000 · OtherRAVENSWOOD FAM…Individual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual gra…LINDSAY WILDLIFE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: $45,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 · OtherEATSF: $35,000 · OtherECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $40,000 · Other+3 more: $47,500 · OtherCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $180,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $105,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE: $87,500 · AnimalsTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $47,500 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $90,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC AND ARTS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $45,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $42,500 · Environment+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $71,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY: $50,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$6,070,078Other$990,000Animals$420,000Arts & Culture$160,000Environment$88,000Human Services$71,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $6,070,078 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $180,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $115,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWILDCARE: $95,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $90,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE: $87,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $71,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKQED INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY: $50,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $47,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $42,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEHOPE: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC AND ARTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGolden Gate Bird Alliance Prev Golden Gate Audubon Society Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WILDCARE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds TRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WEHOPE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC AND ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Golden Gate Bird Alliance Prev Golden Gate Audubon Society Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The David and Lucile Packard FoundationCA21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Embarcadero Media Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · Bothin Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Niebla Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Niebla Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Niebla’s filings →

    More from the funding graph