Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nicholas a Caspero & Tomiko Vasey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$292kYouth Development$210kEducation$203kCivil Rights$100kHuman Services$96kReligion$60kHealth$60kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$16,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORY AND MOVEMENT CHARLOTTE$75,000
WAYFINDERS$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$25,000
SALVATION ARMY$16,000
CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$12,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ALZAR SCHOOL$8,333
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%IN REACH: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$859k · 7 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$859k
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+15%

Still filing today

43%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MEMORY AND MOVEMENT CHARLOTTE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $268k
  • RB
    R Bruce Irons Camp Fund
    5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +135%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • AL
    American Liver Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -63%
  • SL
    ST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
Alliance for Aging Research

The alliance for aging research is the leading nonprofit organization dedicated to changing the narrative to achieve healthy aging and equitable access to care.

—
7
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…

Science & Tech
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
12
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORY AND MOVEMENT CHARLOTTE: $268,000 · OtherMEMORY AND MOVEMENT CHARLOTTESALVATION ARMY: $86,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $60,000 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INCST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCHST JOHN THE BAPTIST CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherST JOHN THE BAPTIST CHURCHLUCA MEDIA COLLECTIVE: $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherR Bruce Irons Camp Fund: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentR Bruce Irons Camp Fu…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $125,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …ALZAR SCHOOL INC: $8,333 · EducationALZAR SCHOOL I…Echo Foundation: $100,000 · Civil RightsEcho Found…American Liver Foundation: $50,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 · HealthInReach: $10,000 · Human ServicesROOF ABOVE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$538,000Youth Development$200,000Education$133,333Civil Rights$100,000Health$60,000Human Services$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetR Bruce Irons Camp Fund: $200,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEcho Foundation: $100,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInReach: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MECKLENBURG COUNTY COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZAR SCHOOL INC: $8,333 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds R Bruce Irons Camp Fund ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Echo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American Liver Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds InReach ↗
  • Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MECKLENBURG COUNTY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ALZAR SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · LPL Financial Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nicholas a Caspero & Tomiko Vasey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nicholas a Caspero & Tomiko Vasey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nicholas a Caspero & Tomiko Vasey Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nicholas a Caspero & Tomiko Vasey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nicholas a Caspero & Tomiko Vasey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph