Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ngh Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Human Services$2.2MInternational$1.4MHealth$301kReligion$247kFood & Nutrition$137kCivil Rights$100kHousing & Shelter$60kArts & Culture$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $108k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $290k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $320k
  • $250k+2 grants · $800k
$5,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$500,000
WORLD VISION$300,000
OLIVE CREST - ORANGE COUNTY$60,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$60,000
WORLD VISION$50,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$50,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$50,000
PHILIPPINE FRONTLINE MINISTRIES$50,000
CHOC FOUNDATION$30,000
MERCY SHIPS$30,000
GLEANINGS FOR THE HUNGRY$30,000
MAP INTERNATIONAL$30,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
ALZEIMERS ASSOCIATION$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE MISSION SOCIETY: $10k → 10%HOPE MISSION SOCIETY: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
IA
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 45 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
7

Total granted

$3.5M
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-9%

Still filing today

53%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OLIVE CREST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $160k · revenue +59%
  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +16%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • JH
    JEREMIAH'S HOPE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -75%
  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -9%
  • PF
    PHILLIPINE FRONTLINE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
2
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International
3
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
4
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
5
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

6
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

7
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
8
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc

Catholic medical mission board (cmmb) is an international, faith-based nonprofit that believes in healthier lives worldwide. we work in partnerships globally to deliver locally sustainable, quality health solutions, (continued on schedule…

International
11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Awakening to God Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …Military Veterans SupportYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%29%35–55yr13%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%64%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%7%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,943

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $1,950,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY+32 more — $456,900 · Other+32 moreWORLD VISION INC — $925,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $150,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONALMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $120,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCPHILIPPINE FRONTLINE MINISTRIES INC — $110,000 · InternationalPHILIPPINE FRONTLINE MINISTRIES INCMercy Ships International — $70,000 · InternationalMAP International Inc — $70,000 · International+1 more — $13,000 · InternationalOLIVE CREST — $160,000 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATION — $70,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $60,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $45,000 · Health+2 more — $18,000 · HealthYOUTH WITH A MISSION GLEANINGS FOR THE HUNGRY — $72,000 · ReligionAWAKENING TO GOD MINISTRIES — $35,000 · ReligionALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $100,000 · Civil RightsJEREMIAH'S HOPE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesHOPE MISSION SOCIETY — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $15,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $15,000 · Human ServicesUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $17,000 · EducationSTONEYBROOKE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $12,000 · Education
Other$2,406,900International$1,458,000Health$353,000Religion$107,000Civil Rights$100,000Human Services$75,000Education$29,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC — $925,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $160,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILIPPINE FRONTLINE MINISTRIES INC — $110,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAP International Inc — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAWAKENING TO GOD MINISTRIES — $35,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetJEREMIAH'S HOPE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHOPE MISSION SOCIETY — $20,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget7 DAY HERO — $13,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTONEYBROOKE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAGUNA CANYON FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAgape International Missions — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds PHILIPPINE FRONTLINE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION GLEANINGS FOR THE HUNGRY
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MAP International Inc
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds AWAKENING TO GOD MINISTRIES
  • Who funds JEREMIAH'S HOPE INC
  • Who funds HOPE MISSION SOCIETY
  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE
  • Who funds 7 DAY HERO
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC
  • Who funds STONEYBROOKE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds LAGUNA CANYON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ngh Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ngh Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ngh Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph