Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.4M
Granted FY2021
106
Grants FY2021
12
States reached
$940k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 34 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust named its own grantees at scale: 81 organizations, $5M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

36
’17
58
’18
57
’19
61
’20
81
’21
60
’22
58
’23
34
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$17MInternational$8.2MReligion$2.3MEnvironment$2.2MEducation$1.6MArts & Culture$1.5MPublic Benefit$1.3MCivil Rights$1.0MOther$0
02FY2021 · 106 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k25 grants · $118k
  • $10k–50k52 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$157M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$940,000
ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY COUNCIL$700,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$240,000
FRIENDS OF ELNET$233,658
FOUNDATION FOR THE DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES$225,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$150,000
ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION$125,000
HONEST REPORTING$125,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$100,000
ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE$100,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO$90,400
18DOORS$90,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO$85,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER (IDC)$80,000
UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $887k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CENTER FOR EMERGING FUTURES: $10k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $23k → 8%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 8%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 8%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 8%Osher Marin Jewish Community Center: $15k → 8%THE ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES INC: $3k → 14%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $25k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $25k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $7k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%FRIENDS OF ISRAELI FLYING AID INC: $10k → 17%COMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS: $36k → 8%COMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS: $36k → 8%Community Venture Partners Inc: $36k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%COMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS: $36k → 8%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $2k → 10%Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles: $20k → 14%COMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS: $36k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%COMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS INC: $25k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%COMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS INC: $11k → 8%ISRAELI AMERICAN COUNCIL: $1k → 14%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $4k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 10%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $8k → 10%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 8%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 8%Jewish Family and Children's Services: $55k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES (SAN FRANCISCO): $50k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES (SAN FRANCISCO): $50k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES (SAN FRANCISCO): $45k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $30k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $37k → 10%MORE IN COMMON: $50k → 17%MORE IN COMMON INC: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
NM
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 116 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

116 repeat relationships — 78 still active in FY2021, 38 since wound down; 58 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

116
49

Total granted

$18M
$984k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+14%

Still filing today

70%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ELNET
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +77%
  • FF
    Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $695k · revenue +147%
  • ME
    MIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $625k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF EUROPEAN LEADERSHIP NETWORK
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • JC
    Jewish Community Relations Council San Francisco
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • CF
    Committee for Accuracy in Middle East
    one grant, 2020 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
3
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
4
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
5
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
7
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
8
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
10
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
11
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
12
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Common Ground Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Lgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Community Arts CentersOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%60%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/177
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,388

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

162 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 162 of the 238 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
157/162
Grantees still filing
107/162
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $14,460,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $1,292,500 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $596,700 · Philanthropy+10 more — $803,697 · PhilanthropyElectric Infrastructure Security Council — $2,100,000 · OtherElectric Infrastructure Se…JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $411,000 · Other+98 more — $6,363,085 · Other+98 moreFRIENDS OF ELNET — $1,460,655 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ELNETFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $695,000 · InternationalFoundation for the D…MIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $625,000 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AN…International Rescue Committee INC — $525,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue…American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $479,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of …JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $359,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $352,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL — $287,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $231,250 · International+25 more — $1,731,000 · International+25 moreISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $530,000 · EducationTHE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES INC — $196,500 · EducationCENTER FOR CREATIVE CHANGE — $185,000 · EducationSIXPOINT INC — $165,000 · EducationHACKS HACKERS — $125,000 · EducationSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $90,000 · EducationSan Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc — $80,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ARTS — $73,500 · Education+19 more — $542,000 · EducationOPENDOR MEDIA INC — $410,000 · ReligionINTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC — $340,000 · ReligionJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS — $249,600 · ReligionONETABLE INC — $175,000 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSE — $95,000 · ReligionJEWBELONG INC — $63,500 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $50,000 · Religion+3 more — $65,000 · ReligionJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $280,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS INC — $213,000 · Human ServicesBERNARD OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $128,800 · Human ServicesMORE IN COMMON INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $77,450 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $50,000 · Human Services+4 more — $47,500 · Human ServicesFAIRVOTE — $265,500 · Civil RightsUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA — $162,500 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $145,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY — $115,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $55,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $18,000 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$17,152,897Other$8,874,085International$6,744,905Education$1,987,000Religion$1,448,100Human Services$876,750Civil Rights$761,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $14,460,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET — $1,460,655 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $1,292,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $695,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $625,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $596,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $530,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $525,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $479,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $411,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC — $410,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $359,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $352,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetINTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC — $340,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA — $330,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL — $287,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $280,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFAIRVOTE — $265,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS — $249,600 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $231,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC — $225,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA — $220,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS INC — $213,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetART OVER HATE COLLECTIVE INC F/K/N ARTISTS 4 ISRAEL INC — $200,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC — $198,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES INC — $196,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR CREATIVE CHANGE — $185,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetONETABLE INC — $175,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSIXPOINT INC — $165,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA — $162,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetISSUE ONE — $150,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $150,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAICE INC AMERICAN-ISRAELI COOPERATIVE ENTERPRISE — $150,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $145,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $138,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC — $135,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetBERNARD OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $128,800 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $127,097 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHACKS HACKERS — $125,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetMILLENNIAL ACTION PROJECT DBA FUTURE CAUCUS — $125,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetWESTERN STATES CENTER — $125,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $121,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY — $115,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $100,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FAIRVOTE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds HONESTREPORTINGCOM INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY VENTURE PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ART OVER HATE COLLECTIVE INC F/K/N ARTISTS 4 ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CREATIVE CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds ONETABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIXPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA ↗
  • Who funds ISSUE ONE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Newton D & Rochel…Jewish Community Fede…Koret FoundationThe Shimon Ben Joseph…Jewish Community Foun…The Milstein Family F…Combined Jewish Phila…The Marcus Foundation…FjcGoodman Family Suppor…Jewish Communal FundJewish Federation of …
The Newton D & Rochelle F Becker FoundationCA68.2× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Newton D & Rochelle F Becker Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Koret Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Milstein Family Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Marcus Foundation Inc · Fjc · Goodman Family Supporting Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Pacific University — 2% of income from government
  • The Poynter Institute for Media Studies Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 238 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines