Skip to content
New Story Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

New Story Inc

New story, inc.

$599k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$392k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$8.4MHuman Services$4.3MYouth Development$410kPublic Safety & Disaster$213kReligion$190kFood & Nutrition$177kCrime & Legal$144k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $391,710, the rows itemized in this filing. The $599,252 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $207,542 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$391,710
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FULLER CENTER$391,710
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISSION OF HOPE: $1.4M → 11%MISSION OF HOPE: $1.0M → 11%MISSION OF HOPE: $623k → 11%MISSION OF HOPE: $545k → 11%MISSION OF HOPE: $413k → 11%MISSION OF HOPE: $300k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $208k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$208k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: To Construct New Homes related to the Organization's program

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 3 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$12M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+34%

Still filing today

33%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Fuller Center for Housing of Macon Georgia Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.7M · revenue -62%
  • MO
    MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $4.3M · revenue +141% · 93% of their budget
  • YW
    YOUTH WITH A MISSION - SAN DIEGOBAJA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $190k

Funded once

  • LI
    LIVE IN PEACE
    one grant, 2020 · $410k · revenue -21%
  • LV
    LOS VECINOS DE BUFORD HIGHWAY
    one grant, 2020 · $271k · revenue -68% · 44% of their budget
  • GH
    GWINNETT HOUSING CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $245k · revenue +229%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Welcome Co-Op Inc

Our mission is to provide a welcoming home for refugees where they can find immediate safety and stability to begin a new life.

Human Services
2
Hope Atlanta Inc

Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.

—
3
We Love Buford Highway Inc

We Love Buford Highway is a 501(c)3 nonprofit preserving the multicultural identity of Atlanta's Buford Highway. We curate a multicultural coalition to illuminate how immigrants thrive in an ever-changing south.

Philanthropy
4
Access to Our Community

To protect housing and prevent eviction, offer services, rograms, and engage in other community activities that and support the success, health, and development of our community, emphasizing immigrants and refugees.

Community Improvement
5
Housing Justice League Inc

We work with renters and homeowners to self-organize and defend their right to remain. We fight to preserve affordable housing for just living conditions to prevent gentrification and to build community power for an Atlanta-wide housing…

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Miami Inc

Habitat for humanity of greater miami (hfhgm) is a christian ministry whose purpose is to build homes and communities in partnership with low-income families within greater miami.

Housing & Shelter
7
New American Pathways Inc

New american pathways is an atlanta based nonprofit with the mission of helping refugees and georgia thrive.

Human Services
8
Habitat for Humanity of Glynn County Ga Inc

To collaborate with others to eliminate substandard, overcrowded and unsafe housing in Glynn County by building simple, safe, decent and affordable homes. To improve housing conditions through home construction, rehabilitation, repairs,

—
9
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Chattanooga Area Inc

Habitat for humanity of greater chattanooga (hfh-gc) brings together businesses, churches, and other community organizations in partnership with low income families to spark authentic transformation in our city through the construction of…

Housing & Shelter
10
Rebuilding Macon Inc

Improve low-income housing by performing repairs and maintenance

Human Services
11
Endeavor Atlanta Inc

Driven by our belief that High-Impact Entrepreneurs transform economies, Endeavor is on a mission to build thriving entrepreneurial ecosystems in emerging and underserved markets around the world.

Community Improvement
12
Latino Community Fund Inc

The Organization supports Latino-serving and Latino-led nonprofit organization and the Latinx community as a whole in Georgia. This support includes advocacy work, program development, technical assistance, grant making, and more. Our…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Refugees Inc; the most unlike its peers is Los Vecinos De Buford Highway. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Fuller Center for Housing of Macon Georgia Inc: $7,694,307 · OtherThe Fuller Center for Housing of Macon Georgia Inc+4 more: $608,204 · Other+4 moreMISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,255,097 · Human ServicesMISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INCLIVE IN PEACE: $410,428 · Youth DevelopmentGWINNETT HOUSING CORPORATION: $244,659 · Housing & ShelterCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $213,031 · Public Safety & DisasterYOUTH WITH A MISSION - SAN DIEGOBAJA: $189,899 · ReligionFRIENDS OF REFUGEES INC: $176,555 · Food & Nutrition
Other$8,302,511Human Services$4,255,097Youth Development$410,428Housing & Shelter$244,659Public Safety & Disaster$213,031Religion$189,899Food & Nutrition$176,555

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,255,097 over 6y, 93% of budgetLIVE IN PEACE: $410,428 over 1y, 12% of budgetLOS VECINOS DE BUFORD HIGHWAY: $270,544 over 1y, 44% of budgetGWINNETT HOUSING CORPORATION: $244,659 over 1y, 18% of budgetFRIENDS OF REFUGEES INC: $176,555 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetGEORGIA ASYLUM & IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC: $144,098 over 1y, 11% of budgetCORAZON INC: $73,482 over 1y, 9.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodNatl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Greater Atlanta IncGA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Story Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Story Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Story’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home