Skip to content
New Horizons Ministries Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New Horizons Ministries Inc

To provide christ-centered nurture for children and families in need, share the love of christ to incarcerated youths and adults, and provide programs and experiences for our staff members that foster spiritual and personal growth.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.2MFood & Nutrition$225kHealth$175kHuman Services$122kEducation$86kInternational$71kCrime & Legal$13kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.9M
$11,100
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HAVEN FOUNDATION$1,933,027
GOOD LIFE MINISTRIES$54,800
LOAVES & FISHES MINISTRY OF FREMONT COUNTY$20,100
SKYLINE MENNONITE CHURCH$18,250
LIFE NETWORK$11,100
PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE$10,300
SAFE$10,300
CANON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$9,600
LIVING STONE CALVARY CHAPEL$6,000
CANON CITY PREGNANCY CENTER$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Pueblo Cooperative Care: $16k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care: $16k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care: $13k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care: $12k → 15%Loaves & Fishes Ministry of Fremont County: $32k → 17%Pueblo Cooperative Care: $12k → 15%Loaves & Fishes Ministry of Fremont County: $32k → 17%Pueblo Cooperative Care: $12k → 15%PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE: $10k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care: $10k → 15%Loaves & Fishes Ministry of Fremont County: $25k → 17%Loaves & Fishes Ministry of Fremont County: $25k → 17%Loaves & Fishes Ministry of Fremont County: $24k → 17%Loaves & Fishes Ministry of Fremont County: $24k → 17%Loaves & Fishes Ministry of Fremont County: $22k → 17%Loaves & Fishes Ministry of Fremont County: $21k → 17%LOAVES & FISHES MINISTRY OF FREMONT COUNTY: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 15 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +128% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$3.9M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
+19%

Still filing today

73%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HAVEN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +493% · 97% of their budget
  • LA
    Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +128%
  • LN
    Life Network
    8× · 2018–2025 · $104k · revenue +298%

Funded once

  • FP
    FAIR PLAY CAMP SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • CP
    CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +19%
  • PC
    Pueblo Cooperative Care
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifes Options Pregnancy Center

Lifes optins pregnancy center is a christian non profit ministry that exists to help pregnant women before, during and after pregnancy with pregnancy tests, ultrasounds and support, parenting classes and free baby items from kids closet.

Health
2
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
3
Hope Pregnancy Support Center

Support Women in Crisis Pregnancy

Health
4
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
5
Loving Arms - a Crisis Pregnancy Center

Sharing the love of christ while promoting sexual integrity and bringing life affirming services to those unprepared for pregnancy or hurt by abortion

Health
6
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
7
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
8
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
9
Cross Timbers Pregnancy Care Center

Cross timbers pregnancy care center is a christian ministry dedicated to preserving the value of human life by providing abortion alternatives, practical assistance, and education to the cross timbers area.

Health
10
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
11
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
12
My Choices Dba Obria Medical Clinics Pnw

To share the truth and love of Jesus Christ in conjunction with a ministry to those facing pregnancy related issues: a pregnant womens' counseling program, a free pregnancy testing program, a maternity support (baby supplies, clothing and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Orphans; the most unlike its peers is Fathers Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HAVEN FOUNDATION: $2,829,281 · ReligionTHE HAVEN FOUNDATION+2 more: $105,260 · ReligionSKYLINE MENNONITE CHURCH: $224,400 · OtherSKYLINE MENNO…Canon Christian Academy: $85,620 · OtherCanon Christi…CANON CITY PREGNANCY CENTER: $54,800 · OtherCANON CITY PR…CALVARY CANON CITY: $45,100 · OtherCALVARY CANON…+4 more: $41,500 · Other+4 moreLoaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County Inc: $224,820 · Human ServicesLoaves an…Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $101,300 · Human ServicesPueblo Co…HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $12,920 · Human ServicesLife Network: $103,720 · HealthFAIR PLAY CAMP SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · HealthCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY: $10,000 · HealthFATHERS FARM: $6,000 · HealthSAFE: $56,900 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE: $20,200 · Youth Development
Religion$2,934,541Other$451,420Human Services$339,040Health$129,720International$56,900Youth Development$20,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HAVEN FOUNDATION: $2,829,281 over 3y, 97% of budgetLoaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County Inc: $224,820 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetLife Network: $103,720 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPueblo Cooperative Care Center: $101,300 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetGOOD LIFE MINISTRIES: $82,260 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetSAFE: $56,900 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetCANON CITY PREGNANCY CENTER: $54,800 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetGOSPEL EXPRESS EVANGELISTIC TEAM MINISTRY INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD ORPHANS: $14,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $12,920 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAIR PLAY CAMP SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HAVEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Life Network ↗
  • Who funds Pueblo Cooperative Care Center ↗
  • Who funds GOOD LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SAFE ↗
  • Who funds CANON CITY PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL EXPRESS EVANGELISTIC TEAM MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD ORPHANS ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds FAIR PLAY CAMP SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FATHERS FARM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anabaptist FoundationEl Pomar FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Anabaptist FoundationPA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Horizons Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Horizons Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Horizons Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home