Skip to content
New Hope Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

New Hope Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$519k
Granted FY2025still arriving
63
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.0MInternational$624kHuman Services$554kCivil Rights$530kEducation$349kHealth$212kFood & Nutrition$115kCommunity Improvement$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k47 grants · $197k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $322k
$5,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION$30,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$30,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$30,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$27,500
BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP$25,000
DES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$22,500
SAINTS MARY AND MATHIAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$20,500
Individual grant recipient$20,000
MATTHEW 25 MINISTRIES$18,000
SPRING VALLEY BIBLE CAMP$17,000
INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE$16,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$15,000
MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y$15,000
SALT COMPANY AT CORNERSTONE$13,000
THREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL$12,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $501k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE: $16k → 7%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $5k → 11%INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE: $15k → 7%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $5k → 11%MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE: $15k → 7%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $5k → 11%MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE: $15k → 7%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $5k → 11%MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE: $8k → 7%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $1k → 11%MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE: $8k → 7%MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE: $2k → 7%MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $15k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $15k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $15k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $15k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $10k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $9k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $9k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $9k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $9k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $8k → 12%UNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $7k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $5k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $5k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 12%UNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $3k → 12%UNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $2k → 12%UNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $2k → 12%UNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $1k → 12%UNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $1k → 12%UNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $1k → 12%UNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of New Hope Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

New Hope Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 97 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

97 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
10

Total granted

$3.6M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+50%

Still filing today

54%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    INSTITUTE ON RELIGION & DEMOCRACY INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $300k · revenue +17%
  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $195k · revenue +125%
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $193k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • CC
    CORNERSTONE CHURCH OF AMES IA (SALT COMPANY FUND)
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -4%
  • WM
    WORLD METHODIST EVANGELISM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
5
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
6
Union Foundation Us

Rigorous biblical and accessible education, training and resources for churches worldwide.

Religion
7
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
8
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
9
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
10
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
11
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
12
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/64
Grantees still filing
48/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD NEWS INC: $150,000 · OtherGOOD NEWS INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $102,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSPRING VALLEY BIBLE CAMP: $93,000 · OtherSPRING VALLEY BIBLE CAMPSAINTS MARY AND MATHIAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $90,500 · OtherSAINTS MARY AND MATHIAS CATHOLIC SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $77,500 · OtherTHE CONFESSING MOVEMENT WITHIN THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $72,000 · OtherMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $78,500 · Other+65 more: $857,100 · Other+65 moreHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $194,500 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $192,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTI…Matthew 25 Ministries Inc: $86,750 · InternationalMatthew 25 Ministri…WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $38,500 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP O…THREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL: $37,500 · InternationalTHREE ROOTS INTERNA…Compassion International Incorporated: $33,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $26,500 · InternationalHOPE GRAFTED IN: $22,000 · International+2 more: $25,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE ON RELIGION & DEMOCRACY INC: $300,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE ON RE…ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $192,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFEND…Care Net: $18,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $1,000 · Civil RightsMARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $240,000 · Human ServicesMARRIAGE ENCOUN…MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $87,500 · Human ServicesMUSCATINE COMMU…THE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA: $78,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMAN CHOIC…FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $57,000 · Human ServicesFLICKINGER LEAR…CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $21,000 · Human ServicesUNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $17,250 · Human Services+1 more: $4,200 · Human ServicesBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $100,000 · ReligionAlpha USA: $48,000 · ReligionWESLEYAN COVENANT ASSOCIATION: $42,500 · ReligionGlobal CHE Enterprises: $25,000 · ReligionFAITHFUL PRESENCE: $20,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $18,500 · Religion+5 more: $11,400 · ReligionDES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $87,500 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $30,000 · EducationNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $24,000 · EducationDORDT UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $18,000 · Education+2 more: $7,000 · EducationPREGNANCY RESOURCES: $50,000 · HealthHOUSE OF HOPE: $30,500 · Health
Other$1,521,100International$656,250Civil Rights$511,000Human Services$504,950Religion$265,400Education$188,500Health$80,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE ON RELIGION & DEMOCRACY INC: $300,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetMARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $240,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $194,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $192,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $192,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEWS INC: $150,000 over 5y, 71% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $100,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $87,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetDES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $87,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $86,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $78,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA: $78,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CONFESSING MOVEMENT WITHIN THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $72,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetFLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $57,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCES: $50,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetAlpha USA: $48,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEYAN COVENANT ASSOCIATION: $42,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $38,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL: $37,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $33,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY: $31,000 over 5y, 46% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE: $30,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC: $27,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $26,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $26,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCES INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetGlobal CHE Enterprises: $25,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $22,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE GRAFTED IN: $22,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetRED BIRD MISSION INC: $21,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAITHFUL PRESENCE: $20,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSOLE HOPE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetThe Becket Fund: $19,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $18,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCare Net: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER: $17,250 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $16,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE GATHERING: $8,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSTITUTE ON RELIGION & DEMOCRACY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds THE CONFESSING MOVEMENT WITHIN THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds Alpha USA ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN COVENANT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds THREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds Global CHE Enterprises ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

HNI Charitable Founda…The Howe FoundationRoy J Carver Charitab…Community Foundation …Jensen Private Founda…Voorhees Family Found…United Way of Muscati…KENT CORPORATION CHAR…Stanley Consultants C…Quad Cities Golf Clas…Christian Community F…Muscatine Charities I…
HNI Charitable FoundationIA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: HNI Charitable Foundation · The Howe Foundation · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine · Jensen Private Foundation Inc · Voorhees Family Foundation · United Way of Muscatine Iowa · KENT CORPORATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION fka KENT-STEIN FOUNDATION · Stanley Consultants Charitable Foundation · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Muscatine Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Hope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Hope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to New Hope Foundation?

Find your warmest path to New Hope Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home