Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence

The Coalition creates safe and just communities through advocacy, prevention and empowerment of anyone affected by sexual violence, domestic violence and stalking.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$22MCrime & Legal$18MHealth$9.9MCivil Rights$3.3M
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $229k
  • $250k+11 grants · $10M
$794,143
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAVEN$1,695,111
Bridges Domestic & Sexual Violence Support$1,250,849
Crisis Center of Central NH$992,695
Reach Crisis Services Inc$983,767
RESPONSE to Sexual and Domestic Violence$921,434
Voices Against Violence$794,143
New Beginnings Womens Crisis$776,910
Monadnock Center for Violence Prevention$768,548
WISE$736,962
Turning Points Network$720,098
Starting Point$718,532
Sexual Harassment & Rape Prevention$228,787
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $24.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%HAVEN: $1.8M → 5%Starting Point: $719k → 9%Turning Points Network: $720k → 10%WISE: $737k → 10%HAVEN: $1.7M → 5%Starting Point: $681k → 9%Turning Points Network: $624k → 10%WISE: $628k → 10%HAVEN: $1.7M → 5%Starting Point: $649k → 9%Turning Points Network: $622k → 10%WISE: $590k → 10%HAVEN: $1.5M → 5%Starting Point: $624k → 9%Turning Points Network: $538k → 10%WISE: $518k → 10%HAVEN: $1.4M → 5%Starting Point: $600k → 9%Turning Points Network: $475k → 10%WISE: $487k → 10%HAVEN: $1.2M → 5%Starting Point: $522k → 9%Turning Points Network: $460k → 10%WISE: $480k → 10%Voices Against Violence: $794k → 10%Support Center at Burch House: $495k → 13%Voices Against Violence: $699k → 10%Support Center at Burch House: $239k → 13%Voices Against Violence: $673k → 10%Voices Against Violence: $640k → 10%Voices Against Violence: $508k → 10%Voices Against Violence: $445k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$53M
$0

Still filing today

92%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HV
    HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9.3M · revenue +96% · 66% of their budget
  • BD
    BRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +119% · 52% of their budget
  • TS
    THRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +99% · 92% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Safe Voices

    The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…

    2
    Community Beyond Violence

    CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

    3
    New Directions Center Inc

    To reduce the impact and occurrence of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and stalking by providing victim support services and raising community awareness.

    Health
    4
    Domestic Violence Project

    The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

    Human Services
    5
    Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

    The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

    Crime & Legal
    6
    Ywca of Central Virginia

    The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

    Human Services
    7
    Project Sage Inc

    Project SAGE creates social change to end interpersonal, relationship violence by challenging attitudes and beliefs about power, control, and gender norms and by advocating for victims and survivors.

    Human Services
    8
    Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

    Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

    9
    Safe of Columbia County

    Domestic and sexual violence intervention, support, and education.

    10
    S a F E Shelter

    We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

    11
    Center for a Non Violent Community

    CNVC supports the right of all people to live their lives free from interpersonal violence. We foster relationships with self, partners, family, and peers. We are dedicated to a community which is supportive of peaceful solutions to…

    Community Improvement
    12
    Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

    The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Starting Point Services for Victims of Domestic & Sexual Violence and the most unlike its peers is Coos County Family Health Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    10
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    12/12
    Grantees still filing
    12/12
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES — $9,251,468 · Human ServicesHAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICESSTARTING POINT SERVICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $3,794,499 · Human ServicesSTARTING POINT SERVICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC & SE…VOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE — $3,759,015 · Human ServicesVOICES AGAINST VIOLENCEWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC — $3,439,990 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALL…THE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES — $3,439,383 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES+1 more — $733,369 · Human ServicesTHRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTER — $4,913,880 · OtherTHRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTERYWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE — $4,720,637 · OtherYWCA NEW HAMPSHIREMONADNOCK CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION — $4,208,014 · OtherMONADNOCK CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PR…UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $1,278,438 · OtherUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHI…BRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES — $5,748,162 · HealthBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND …Coos County Family Health Services Inc — $4,129,934 · HealthCoos County Family He…NEW BEGINNINGS WITHOUT VIOLENCE & ABUSE — $3,284,513 · Civil Rights
    Human Services$24,417,724Other$15,120,969Health$9,878,096Civil Rights$3,284,513

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES — $9,251,468 over 6y, 66% of budgetBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES — $5,748,162 over 6y, 52% of budgetTHRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTER — $4,913,880 over 6y, 92% of budgetYWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE — $4,720,637 over 6y, 62% of budgetMONADNOCK CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION — $4,208,014 over 6y, 79% of budgetCoos County Family Health Services Inc — $4,129,934 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetSTARTING POINT SERVICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $3,794,499 over 6y, 74% of budgetVOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE — $3,759,015 over 6y, 85% of budgetWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC — $3,439,990 over 6y, 32% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES — $3,439,383 over 6y, 41% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS WITHOUT VIOLENCE & ABUSE — $3,284,513 over 6y, 78% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $733,369 over 2y, 2.6% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES
    • Who funds BRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES
    • Who funds THRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTER
    • Who funds YWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE
    • Who funds MONADNOCK CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION
    • Who funds Coos County Family Health Services Inc
    • Who funds STARTING POINT SERVICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE
    • Who funds VOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE
    • Who funds WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC
    • Who funds THE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES
    • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS WITHOUT VIOLENCE & ABUSE
    • Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · New Hampshire Women's Foundation Inc · Granite United Way · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Global Impact · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence?

      Find your warmest path to New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph