· Private foundation
New Balance Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $772k
- $50k–250k38 grants · $3.7M
- $250k+14 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST END BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $2,450,000 |
| BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $1,750,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DORCHESTER | $1,550,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $1,250,000 |
| BEYOND SPORTS FOUNDATION | $1,073,775 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $1,025,000 |
| HARLEM LACROSSE | $600,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES | $500,000 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| LAWRENCE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $390,000 |
| TWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION | $350,000 |
| REDINGTON FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL | $323,436 |
| ESPERANZA ACADEMY | $300,000 |
| MAINE 4-H FOUNATION | $250,000 |
| SUMMER SEARCH BOSTON | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92 repeat relationships — 82 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $525k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC5× · 2021–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +127%- HLHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION5× · 2021–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +57%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC3× · 2023–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +36%
Funded once
- CSCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $333k · revenue +28%
- WFWESTERN FOOTHILLS LAND TRUSTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +51%
- WSWEST SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds SQUASHBUSTERS INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds TWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BEYOND SPORT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds America Scores New England DBA Boston Scores ↗
- Who funds TENACITY INC ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE 100 MILE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MaineHealth Services ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
- Who funds PINE TREE STATE 4-H FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Franciscan Hospital for Children ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds BEYOND SOCCER INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ROWING INC ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA SCORES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Yawkey Foundation II · Riley Mabel Louise Tr Uwill · Amelia Peabody Foundation · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · GivenGain Foundation USA · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Essex County Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Balance Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Incompass Human Services Inc — 94% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- America Scores New England Dba Boston Scores — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
- Charles River Community Health Inc — 20% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Doc Wayne Inc — 15% of income from government
- The Fishing Academy Inc — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc — 11% of income from government
- Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beyond Soccer Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc — 5% of income from government
- Neighborhealth Corporation — 4% of income from government
- Essex Art Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Community Rowing Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Childrens Museum — 1% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Berklee College of Music Inc — 1% of income from government
- Franciscan Hospital for Children — 0% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Arts Academy Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- West Suburban Young Men's Christian Association — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Balance Foundation?
Find your warmest path to New Balance Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.