Skip to content
Neupert Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Neupert Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$5.8MHealth$1.1MHuman Services$213kAnimals$166kEmployment$100kInternational$85kArts & Culture$25kEducation$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$234k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
C4 FOUNDATION$50,000
NO ONE LEFT BEHIND$15,000
PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION$12,500
DISPATCH MEDIA$10,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER$10,000
LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$10,000
WOMENS BOARD OF BNF$10,000
EMMA PADEN FUND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $253k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES: $8k → 9%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%Puppy Jake Foundation: $20k → 10%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%NO ONE LEFT BEHIND: $20k → 7%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $13k → 10%NO ONE LEFT BEHIND: $15k → 7%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $13k → 10%NO ONE LEFT BEHIND: $5k → 7%NO ONE LEFT BEHIND: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

7%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$533k · 9 repeat orgs$6.8M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
22

Total granted

$533k
$6.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+13%

Still filing today

78%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PJ
    PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +2%
  • OH
    OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $93k · revenue +22%
  • NO
    No One Left Behind
    6× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • SC
    Schwab Charitable Sheryl Neupert Charitable Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $5.5M
  • FH
    FRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • F
    FARESTART
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Schwab Charitable Sheryl Neupert Charitable Fund: $5,465,454 · OtherSchwab Charitable Sheryl Neupert Charitable FundFRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,001,013 · OtherFRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CENTER+24 more: $255,750 · OtherSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $300,058 · PhilanthropyPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Human ServicesNo One Left Behind: $70,000 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $50,000 · Human Services+1 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesFARESTART: $100,000 · EmploymentOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $92,500 · Community ImprovementSpirit of America Worldwide: $45,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $30,000 · InternationalBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $14,935 · HealthCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $10,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Health
Other$6,722,217Philanthropy$300,058Human Services$277,500Employment$100,000Community Improvement$92,500International$75,000Health$42,435

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $300,058 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetFARESTART: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $92,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $70,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $50,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCascade Bicycle Club: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $14,935 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arthur J Gallagher Fo…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arthur J Gallagher FoundationIL12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neupert Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neupert Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neupert Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home