Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nesbitt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.2MHuman Services$1.0MAnimals$470kHealth$470kEducation$435kPhilanthropy$395kYouth Development$225kScience & Tech$170kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$125,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT$200,000
PASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$200,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$200,000
NAZARETH HOUSE$200,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
PACIFIC CLINICS$150,000
PASADENA SENIOR CENTER$150,000
UNITED FRIENDS OF THE$125,000
PASADENA MEALS ON WHEELS$100,000
HELPING HANDS FOR THE BLIND$100,000
Individual grant recipient$90,000
WOODCRAFT RANGERS INC$90,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
JOURNEY HOUSE$75,000
FULFILLMENT FUND$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PACIFIC CLINICS: $150k → 8%JOURNEY HOUSE: $50k → 17%PACIFIC CLINICS: $150k → 8%JOURNEY HOUSE: $40k → 17%PACIFIC CLINICS: $150k → 8%JOURNEY HOUSE: $30k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $75k → 14%HELPING HANDS FOR THE BLIND: $100k → 14%HELPING HANDS FOR THE BLIND: $80k → 14%HELPING HANDS FOR THE BLIND: $75k → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $150k → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $50k → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $35k → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $20k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $75k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $60k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $50k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 16 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -72% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$5.0M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-72%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23’24’25
Human ServicesScience & TechCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GD
    GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT
    4× · 2020–2025 · $470k · revenue +84%
  • PC
    PACIFIC CLINICS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $450k · revenue +38%
  • PS
    PASADENA SENIOR CENTER
    4× · 2020–2025 · $255k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • FT
    FIND THE CHILDREN
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -72%
  • EC
    EASTSIDE CENTER FOR THE BLIND
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Fid Group Friends in Deed

The fid group is a not-for-profit that delivers social services to people in the greater pasadena area who are experiencing homelessness, food vulnerabilities, and poverty.

Religion
2
Pathlight Inc

Pathlight partners with people with disabilities and their families to create opportunities to build relationships throughout their lives.

—
3
Pasadena Day Nursery for Child

To provide quality educational and physical development programs for pre-kindergarten

—
4
Outward Bound California

The purpose of this corporation is to help people of all ages and walks of life build personal strengths needed to succeed in life, through operating challenging experiential learning courses and programs in school, urban and wilderness…

Recreation & Sports
5
Women At Work

Women at work provides web-based job and career resource services with a mission to help women reach their full employment and earnings potential.

—
6
Panorama West Inc

Rental apartments for low income seniors

Housing & Shelter
7
Pacific View Charter School

To focus on the success of each student & involve parents in the education of their children. the school is comitted to providing appropriate physical space, materials, qualified personnel, and staff development in order to guide the…

Education
8
United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy
9
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
10
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
11
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
12
Jvs Socal

Jvs socal is a california nonsectarian nonprofit serving nearly 30,000 clients per year offering hope and opportunity to a diverse community through job training, mentoring and education, combined with expert career guidance and employer…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pasadena Educational Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pacific Clinics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $980,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT: $470,000 · OtherGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERTUNITED FRIENDS OF THE: $395,000 · OtherUNITED FRIENDS OF THEIndividual grant recipient: $310,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNAZARETH HOUSE: $300,000 · OtherNAZARETH HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $230,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOODCRAFT RANGERS: $225,000 · OtherWOODCRAFT RANGERSPASADENA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $225,000 · OtherPASADENA MEALS ON WHEELS INCIndividual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $170,000 · Other+1 more: $20,000 · OtherPACIFIC CLINICS: $450,000 · Human ServicesPACIFIC CLINICSPASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $255,000 · Human ServicesPASADENA SENIOR CENTERHELPING HANDS FOR THE BLIND: $255,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS FOR THE BLINDFULFILLMENT FUND: $235,000 · Human ServicesFULFILLMENT FUNDJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INCJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INCPASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 · PhilanthropyGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $170,000 · Science & TechFIND THE CHILDREN: $50,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,500,000Human Services$1,390,000Philanthropy$200,000Science & Tech$170,000Crime & Legal$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $980,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT: $470,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $450,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $255,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOR THE BLIND: $255,000 over 3y, 89% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $235,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWOODCRAFT RANGERS: $225,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPASADENA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $225,000 over 4y, 29% of budgetPASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $120,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFIND THE CHILDREN: $50,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds WOODCRAFT RANGERS ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIND THE CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rose Hills FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nesbitt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nesbitt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nesbitt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph