· Private foundation
Nelson Mead Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 105 grants below total $385,572 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $461,772 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $76,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k92 grants · $198k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $188k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hazelden | $32,500 |
| St. Paul's Episcopal Church | $26,000 |
| New Bedford Symphony Orchestra | $15,000 |
| The Conservation Fund | $14,000 |
| Guardians of Martin County Inc | $13,000 |
| Ethel Walker School | $13,000 |
| Everglades Foundation | $12,000 |
| Friends of the Lobkowicz Collections | $12,000 |
| Vassar College | $10,200 |
| RARE | $10,000 |
| Banner Lake Club | $10,000 |
| World Wildlife Fund | $10,000 |
| The Friends of VIM Clinic | $10,000 |
| Southern Poverty Law Center | $8,000 |
| Planned Parenthood | $8,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
84 repeat relationships — 84 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGTHE GUARDIANS OF MARTIN COUNTY INC2× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +1%
- RRARE2× · 2022–2024 · $21k · revenue +32%
- VCVASSAR COLLEGE2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- TUThe University of Virginia, The College Foundationone grant, 2022 · $5k
- MSMILLBROOK SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +58%
- TCTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDRENone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GUARDIANS OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
- Who funds RARE ↗
- Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds DARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds REED INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES OF HOBE SOUND INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD REHABILITATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH YARMOUTH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Clair Charitable Trust · Legatus Foundation · CMB Foundation · Ethel D Colket Foundation · Colket Family Foundation · The James E & Constance L Bell Foundation · The David and Elizabeth Long Foundation · Cox Foundation Inc · Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane · The Patton Charitable Foundation · Woodward Family Charitable Foundation · Fore River Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nelson Mead Fund?
Find your warmest path to Nelson Mead Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.