Skip to content
Neighborhood Development Collaborative Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Neighborhood Development Collaborative Inc

None

$434k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$1.1MCommunity Improvement$86kCivil Rights$61kCrime & Legal$11kReligion$11k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $391k
$60,714
Median grant
1
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKY MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES$103,736
HOPE COMMUNITIES$80,170
THE FAX PARTNERSHIP$75,000
MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS$71,566
EAST COLFAX COMMUNITY COLLECT$60,714
MILE HIGH MINISTRIES$10,714
JUSTICE FOR THE PEOPLE LEGAL$10,714
GES COALITION$10,714
ELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUS$10,714
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $72k → 12%MILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhood Development Collaborative Inc

None

Housing & Shelter
2
Colorado Community Land Trust Denver Llc

To provide opportunities for low and moderate income people to secure decent affordable housing and to assure quantity, quality and affordability of housing for future low and moderate income individuals.

Philanthropy
3
Thistle Community Housing

The Mission of Thistle Communities is to create and preserve quality, permanently affordable rental and ownership homes for working families, seniors and people with disabilities. Thistles homes allow teachers, health-care workers, and…

Housing & Shelter
4
Denver Community Ventures

To empower low-income families and individuals towards self-sufficiency and independent living.

Housing & Shelter
5
Housing Colorado

Housing colorado! is a unified voice supporting the presentation and production of quality affordable housing for low and moderate income coloradans through education and advocacy statewide in order to build a strong economy

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Housing Development Association Inc

The organization's purpose is to develop, own, and operate affordable housing in south metro denver for low-income and special needs populations.

Housing & Shelter
7
Solid Rock Community Developmentcorporation

We are working to build a diverse Southeast Colorado Springs economy that emphasizes the creation of more affordable housing small business development and investment in healthy community environments. Our goal is to address and dismantle…

Human Services
8
Boulder Housing Coalition

Provide affordable cooperative housing to the people of Colorado's Front Range.

Housing & Shelter
9
Indiedwell Colorado

To provide affordable housing solutions and generate local and regional economic development.

Housing & Shelter
10
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
11
Urban Land Conservancy

Urban land conservancy's mission is to acquire, develop, and/or preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs especially in high poverty, low-income, underserved, at-risk communities.

Community Improvement
12
Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation

Community resources and housing development corporation provides pathways to home and asset building opportunities to benefit low-to-moderate income communities throughout colorado.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Del Norte Neighborhood Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Hope Communities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEL NORTE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $735,555 · Housing & ShelterDEL NORTE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONROCKY MOUNTAIN MUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATION INC: $103,736 · Housing & ShelterROCKY MOUNTAIN MUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATION INCNortheast Denver Housing Center: $88,372 · Housing & ShelterNortheast Denver Housing CenterHOPE COMMUNITIES INC: $80,170 · Housing & ShelterHOPE COMMUNITIES INC+1 more: $10,714 · Housing & ShelterEAST DENVER COLFAX PARTNERSHIP INC: $75,000 · Community ImprovementEAST DENVER …East Colfax Community Collective: $60,714 · Community ImprovementEast Colfax …GES COALITION INC: $10,714 · Community ImprovementGES COALITIO…MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $71,566 · Human ServicesMILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $10,714 · Human ServicesNEWSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP INC: $30,265 · OtherJUSTICE FOR THE PEOPLE LEGAL: $10,714 · Other
Housing & Shelter$1,018,547Community Improvement$146,428Human Services$82,280Other$40,979

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEL NORTE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $735,555 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN MUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATION INC: $103,736 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNortheast Denver Housing Center: $88,372 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITIES INC: $80,170 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEAST DENVER COLFAX PARTNERSHIP INC: $75,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetMERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $71,566 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEast Colfax Community Collective: $60,714 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNEWSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP INC: $30,265 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGES COALITION INC: $10,714 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $10,714 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $10,714 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community Founda…The Colorado Health F…The Denver FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Enterprise Community …Gates Family Foundati…Mile High United Way …
Rose Community FoundationCO21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Gates Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neighborhood Development Collaborative Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neighborhood Development Collaborative Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neighborhood Development Collaborative’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home