· Public charity
Neighborhood Development Collaborative Inc
None
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $391k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES | $103,736 |
| HOPE COMMUNITIES | $80,170 |
| THE FAX PARTNERSHIP | $75,000 |
| MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS | $71,566 |
| EAST COLFAX COMMUNITY COLLECT | $60,714 |
| MILE HIGH MINISTRIES | $10,714 |
| GES COALITION | $10,714 |
| ELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUS | $10,714 |
| JUSTICE FOR THE PEOPLE LEGAL | $10,714 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
To provide opportunities for low and moderate income people to secure decent affordable housing and to assure quantity, quality and affordability of housing for future low and moderate income individuals.
To empower low-income families and individuals towards self-sufficiency and independent living.
Housing colorado! is a unified voice supporting the presentation and production of quality affordable housing for low and moderate income coloradans through education and advocacy statewide in order to build a strong economy
We are working to build a diverse Southeast Colorado Springs economy that emphasizes the creation of more affordable housing small business development and investment in healthy community environments. Our goal is to address and dismantle…
The organization's purpose is to develop, own, and operate affordable housing in south metro denver for low-income and special needs populations.
Provide affordable cooperative housing to the people of Colorado's Front Range.
To provide affordable housing solutions and generate local and regional economic development.
Urban land conservancy's mission is to acquire, develop, and/or preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs especially in high poverty, low-income, underserved, at-risk communities.
Community resources and housing development corporation provides pathways to home and asset building opportunities to benefit low-to-moderate income communities throughout colorado.
To be the leading provider of affordable housing opportunities for low-to-moderate income households in Greeley/Weld County.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Del Norte Neighborhood Development Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Hope Communities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DEL NORTE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN MUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Northeast Denver Housing Center ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds EAST DENVER COLFAX PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS ↗
- Who funds East Colfax Community Collective ↗
- Who funds NEWSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP INC ↗
- Who funds GES COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Gates Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neighborhood Development Collaborative Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.