Skip to content

· Private foundation

Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$24kEducation$23kHuman Services$20kYouth Development$15kReligion$11kRecreation & Sports$7kAnimals$3kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$294k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAR THERATPEUTIC ARTS & RECREATION$2,000
ON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN$1,500
ONE MILLION WELLS$1,500
THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$1,450
BROOKFIELD ACADEMY EDUCATION FUND$1,166
AUTISM ALLIANCE$1,000
THE DAZIAH T CRAWFORD FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY'$1,000
HINDU TEMPLE OF CANTON$501
COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY CENTER$500
EKAL VIDYALAYA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $2k → 17%INDEPENDANT LIVING ALLIANCE: $1k → 21%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $2k → 17%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $500 → 17%JARC: $500 → 8%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $1k → 8%JARC: $500 → 8%LIVING&LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $1k → 8%JARC: $500 → 8%LIVING&LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $650 → 8%JARC: $350 → 8%PROGRESSIVE LIFESTYLES INC: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$94k · 17 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
20

Total granted

$94k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+8%

Still filing today

53%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Neutral Zone
    3× · 2020–2022 · $5k · revenue +124%
  • C
    COMMIT-2-CHANGE
    3× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +149%
  • OM
    ONE MILLION WELLS INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • EP
    ELE'S PLACE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -3%
  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITALS
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arc Michigan

Arc michigan empowers local chapters to assure that citizens with disabilites and their families participate fully in and contribute to the life of their community.

—
2
The Arc of Aurora

The arc provides individual and systems change advocacy for persons wih developmental disabilities.

—
3
Michigan Ability Partners

Map partners with veterans and people who have disabilities in support of their self-directed transformation to self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
5
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
6
Spectrum for Living Development Inc

To enable individuals who have developmental and/or physical disabilities to have the opportunity to attain their highest level of skills, purpose and independence.

Human Services
7
Arc of Wabash County Inc

The mission of arc of wabash county, inc. is to challenge, empower, and support individuals with disabilities to reach their highest level of independence. arc of wabash is dedicated to: 1) preserve, protect, and promote the dignity of…

Human Services
8
Macomb Residential Opportunities Inc

To serve individuals with disabilities by providing residential and personal support in a manner that promotes individual dignity, community integration and quality of life

—
9
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
10
Do for One Nyc

To serve people with developmental disabilities

Human Services
11
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
12
Independent Living Resources Inc

Independent living resources is committed to community diversity through advocacy, choice, and education resulting in empowerment for individuals with disabilities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Euro Peds Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROOKFIELD ACADEMY EDUCATION FUND: $22,350 · OtherBROOKFIELD ACADEMY EDUCATION FUNDON MY OWN: $20,155 · OtherON MY OWNFAR THERATPEUTIC ARTS & RECREATION: $6,500 · OtherFAR THERATPEUTIC ARTS & RECREATIONHINDU TEMPLE: $5,226 · OtherHINDU TEMPLEST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITALHINDU TEMPLE OF CANTON: $4,613 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE OF CANTONSHRINERS HOSPITALS: $3,000 · Other+16 more: $13,351 · Other+16 moreON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $5,500 · HealthON MY OWN …MARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,600 · HealthMARCH OF D…THE EURO PEDS FOUNDATION: $1,250 · HealthTHE EURO P…AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN: $1,000 · HealthAUTISM ALL…PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,000 · HealthPARALYZED …BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthCOMMIT-2-CHANGE: $4,000 · Human ServicesCOMMIT-2-…LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $2,650 · Human ServicesLIVING & …JARC: $1,850 · Human ServicesJARCINDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE: $1,000 · Human ServicesINDEPENDE…+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesNeutral Zone: $5,250 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLACE INC: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentONE MILLION WELLS INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentBEST BUDDY PET RESCUE: $2,000 · AnimalsDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsSHRIMAD RAJCHANDRA LOVE AND CARE -USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $500 · InternationalTHE SAMBURU PROJECT INC: $121 · InternationalThe Art Experience Inc: $251 · Arts & Culture
Other$80,195Health$10,850Human Services$9,750Youth Development$9,250Environment$3,000Animals$3,000International$1,621Arts & Culture$251

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNeutral Zone: $5,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMIT-2-CHANGE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetONE MILLION WELLS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $2,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEST BUDDY PET RESCUE: $2,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetJARC: $1,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EURO PEDS FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSHRIMAD RAJCHANDRA LOVE AND CARE -USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Experience Inc: $251 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROGRESSIVE LIFESTYLES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAMBURU PROJECT INC: $121 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Neutral Zone ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMIT-2-CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds ONE MILLION WELLS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BEST BUDDY PET RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EURO PEDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRIMAD RAJCHANDRA LOVE AND CARE -USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
  • Who funds The Art Experience Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph