· Private foundation
Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAR THERATPEUTIC ARTS & RECREATION | $2,000 |
| ONE MILLION WELLS | $1,500 |
| ON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN | $1,500 |
| THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE | $1,450 |
| BROOKFIELD ACADEMY EDUCATION FUND | $1,166 |
| AUTISM ALLIANCE | $1,000 |
| DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY' | $1,000 |
| THE DAZIAH T CRAWFORD FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| HINDU TEMPLE OF CANTON | $501 |
| COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY CENTER | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Neutral Zone3× · 2020–2022 · $5k · revenue +124%- CCOMMIT-2-CHANGE3× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +149%
- OMONE MILLION WELLS INC2× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +148%
Funded once
- EPELE'S PLACE INCone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -3%
- SHSHRINERS HOSPITALSone grant, 2018 · $3k
- VOVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICAone grant, 2017 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Arc michigan empowers local chapters to assure that citizens with disabilites and their families participate fully in and contribute to the life of their community.
The arc provides individual and systems change advocacy for persons wih developmental disabilities.
Map partners with veterans and people who have disabilities in support of their self-directed transformation to self-sufficiency.
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…
To enable individuals who have developmental and/or physical disabilities to have the opportunity to attain their highest level of skills, purpose and independence.
The mission of arc of wabash county, inc. is to challenge, empower, and support individuals with disabilities to reach their highest level of independence. arc of wabash is dedicated to: 1) preserve, protect, and promote the dignity of…
To serve individuals with disabilities by providing residential and personal support in a manner that promotes individual dignity, community integration and quality of life
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
To serve people with developmental disabilities
The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.
Independent living resources is committed to community diversity through advocacy, choice, and education resulting in empowerment for individuals with disabilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Euro Peds Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds Neutral Zone ↗
- Who funds COMMIT-2-CHANGE ↗
- Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds ONE MILLION WELLS INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds BEST BUDDY PET RESCUE ↗
- Who funds JARC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds THE EURO PEDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SHRIMAD RAJCHANDRA LOVE AND CARE -USA INC ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
- Who funds The Art Experience Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Neelam -Popat Mistry Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.