Skip to content

· Private foundation

Navrat Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$146kEducation$143kHealth$128kFood & Nutrition$45kYouth Development$21kRecreation & Sports$11kHousing & Shelter$6kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
$9,600
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TGR FOUNDATION$28,600
HOLY FAMILY PARISH$15,000
MARION COUNTY FOOD BANK$15,000
FIRST TEE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$9,600
THE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE MISSION$5,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$2,500
AMERICAN PUBLIC SQUARE AT JEWELL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARRY HYNES MEMORIAL HOSPICE: $5k → 16%UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES: $10k → 15%UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES: $5k → 15%UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES: $5k → 15%UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES: $5k → 15%UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES: $3k → 15%EARLYSTART: $1k → 15%THE DON BOSCO CENTER: $1k → 15%THE DON BOSCO CENTER: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$436k · 16 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
15

Total granted

$436k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+31%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $51k · revenue +5%
  • UI
    UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $29k · revenue +26%
  • ZI
    ZETA IOTA ZETA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $22k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • KM
    KAPAUN MT CARMEL CATHOLIC HS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • TW
    TIGER WOODS CHARITY EVENT CORP
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue -15%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH -CLAY CTR
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
6
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
7
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
8
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
9
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
12
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiger Woods Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Zeta Iota Zeta Educational Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY FAMILY PARISH: $72,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY PARISHMARION COUNTY FOOD BANK: $45,000 · OtherMARION COUNTY FOOD BANKST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCHKAPAUN MT CARMEL CATHOLIC HS: $25,000 · OtherKAPAUN MT CARMEL CATHOLIC HSVIA CHRISTI FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WICHITA: $11,000 · OtherSAINT AGNES CATHOLIC PARISH: $10,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH -CLAY CTR: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $31,700 · Other+13 moreST LUKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $110,000 · HealthST LUKE HOSPITAL FOUNDAT…TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $50,600 · EducationTIGER WOODS FOUNDAT…ZETA IOTA ZETA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $21,750 · EducationZETA IOTA ZETA EDUC…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $10,500 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUN…ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationUNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesHarry Hynes Memorial Hospice Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $2,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC: $20,900 · Recreation & SportsTIGER WOODS CHARITY EVENT CORP: $11,000 · PhilanthropyBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 · Animals
Other$246,700Health$110,000Education$85,850Human Services$36,000Recreation & Sports$20,900Philanthropy$11,000Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LUKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $50,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC: $29,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetZETA IOTA ZETA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $21,750 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetJUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC: $20,900 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTIGER WOODS CHARITY EVENT CORP: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHarry Hynes Memorial Hospice Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPS ARTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST LUKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ZETA IOTA ZETA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds VIA CHRISTI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIGER WOODS CHARITY EVENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Harry Hynes Memorial Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE DON BOSCO CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PS ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Kansas City IncMO13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Navrat Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Navrat Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Navrat Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph