Skip to content

· Public charity

National Safety Council

The NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL's mission is to eliminate the leading causes of preventable death and injury.

$963k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$148k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.6MHealth$1.1MEducation$751kEnvironment$503kCommunity Improvement$486kScience & Tech$415kRecreation & Sports$410kYouth Development$331kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $783,579, the rows itemized in this filing. The $963,189 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $179,610 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $757k
$106,817
Median grant
7
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICA WALKS INC$147,532
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC$118,426
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$111,423
MIAMI DADE DEPT TRANS PUB WRKS$106,817
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$100,118
HOFSTRA UNIVERITY$95,916
MASSACHUSETTS BICYCLE COALITION INC$76,599
UNIV OF CA SANTA BARBARA$26,748
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER - PATHS: $120k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER - PATHS: $12k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of National Safety Council’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

National Safety Councillessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 28 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against -87% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
10

Total granted

$4.9M
$751k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-87%

Still filing today

46%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $402k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMART GROWTH AMERICA
    3× · 2018–2020 · $375k · revenue +6%
  • AW
    America Walks Inc
    3× · 2019–2025 · $318k · revenue +43%
  • BC
    BICYCLE COLORADO
    4× · 2019–2024 · $202k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS
    one grant, 2018 · $181k
  • NO
    NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR YOUTH SAFETY
    one grant, 2024 · $140k · revenue -87% · 27% of their budget
  • BO
    BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    one grant, 2019 · $140k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Usa Cycling Inc

Usa cycling is the national governing body for cycling, making it responsible for the conduct and administration of cycling in the usa. the mission of usa cycling is to develop the sport of cycling in the united states at all levels and to…

Recreation & Sports
2
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
American College Health Association

The american college health association (acha) serves as the principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research.

Health
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
8
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
9
American Council of Engineering Companies

The business association and voice of america's engineering industry, representing thousands of independent u.s. engineering companies engaged in the development of transportation, water, and other public and commercial facilities.

—
10
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
11
National Asphalt Pavement Association Inc

The national asphalt pavement association inc. is the only trade association that exclusively represents the interests of the asphalt producer and paving contractor on the national level with congress, government agencies, and other…

—
12
San Francisco Bicycle Coalition

The mission of San Francisco Bicycle Coalition is to transform San Francisco's streets and neighborhoods into more livable and safe places by promoting the bicycle for everyday transportation.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health By Design Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $389,671 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANTennessee Technological University: $348,018 · OtherTennessee Technological UniversityTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $222,725 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $191,287 · OtherNEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: $188,962 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $184,683 · OtherCITY OF CHICAGO: $183,416 · OtherCITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS: $181,240 · OtherCENTER FOR LATINO PROGRESS CONNECTICUT PUERTO RICAN FORUM INC: $167,479 · OtherCITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH: $166,541 · OtherCLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS: $153,561 · OtherMIAMI DADE COMMUNITY ACTION & HUMAN SERVICES: $146,417 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $141,888 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR YOUTH SAFETY: $139,686 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $139,652 · OtherROADWAY SAFETY FOUNDATION: $138,450 · Other+15 more: $986,532 · Other+15 moreBICYCLE COLORADO: $201,766 · EducationBICYCLE CO…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $157,253 · EducationJOHNS HOPK…University of Miami: $111,423 · EducationUniversity…HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $95,916 · EducationHOFSTRA UN…America Walks Inc: $317,787 · Recreation & SportsWashington Area Bicyclist Association: $92,384 · Recreation & SportsSMART GROWTH AMERICA: $374,676 · EnvironmentTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $150,000 · HealthHEALTH BY DESIGN INC: $135,802 · HealthINSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS INC: $176,598 · Science & TechNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $138,463 · Human Services
Other$4,070,208Education$566,358Recreation & Sports$410,171Environment$374,676Health$285,802Science & Tech$176,598Human Services$138,463

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSMART GROWTH AMERICA: $374,676 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetAmerica Walks Inc: $317,787 over 3y, 23% of budgetBICYCLE COLORADO: $201,766 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetINSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS INC: $176,598 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCENTER FOR LATINO PROGRESS CONNECTICUT PUERTO RICAN FORUM INC: $167,479 over 2y, 10% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $157,253 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR YOUTH SAFETY: $139,686 over 1y, 27% of budgetNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $138,463 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetROADWAY SAFETY FOUNDATION: $138,450 over 2y, 14% of budgetHEALTH BY DESIGN INC: $135,802 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC: $118,426 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $111,423 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington Area Bicyclist Association: $92,384 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER: $62,513 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SMART GROWTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds America Walks Inc ↗
  • Who funds BICYCLE COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LATINO PROGRESS CONNECTICUT PUERTO RICAN FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR YOUTH SAFETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROADWAY SAFETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH BY DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Washington Area Bicyclist Association ↗
  • Who funds National Association of County Engineers ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS BICYCLE COALITION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AARPDC21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AARP · Global Philanthropy Partnership · Peopleforbikes Foundation · Helen & William Mazer Foundation · United States Energy Foundation · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Safety Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Safety Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Safety Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph