Skip to content
National Park Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Park Foundation

As the official philanthropic partner of the national park service, the NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION generates private support and builds strategic partnerships to protect and enhance america's national parks for present and future generations.

$103M
Granted FY2025still arriving
286
Grants FY2025still arriving
47
States reached
$21M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$186MRecreation & Sports$72MArts & Culture$46MPublic Safety & Disaster$11MHealth$9.1MYouth Development$6.5MCrime & Legal$4.2MCommunity Improvement$4.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 286 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 286 grants below total $82,031,554, the rows itemized in this filing. The $102,969,129 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,937,575 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k71 grants · $1.8M
  • $50k–250k178 grants · $19M
  • $250k+32 grants · $61M
$79,189
Median grant
47
States reached
$579M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YELLOWSTONE FOREVER$21,100,370
AMERICAN CONSERVATION EXPERIENCE$7,106,692
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$6,924,749
NATIONAL PARK FRIENDS ALLIANCE$2,798,300
NPS RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP & SCIENCE$2,332,029
ZION NATIONAL PARK FOREVER PROJECT$1,975,138
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$1,761,069
NPS-NATIONAL PARK SRVC$1,489,800
NPS LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT$1,355,000
ALASKA GEOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION$1,354,000
EMMETT TILL INTERPRETIVE CENTER$1,166,000
VOYAGEURS NATIONAL PARK ASSOCIATION$1,065,000
INDEPENDENCE HISTORICAL TRUST$1,033,275
NPS INTERIOR REGIONS 6 7 & 8$1,007,180
SITNASUAK NATIVE CORPORATION$972,077
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Centro de Cultura Arte Trabajo y Educacion: $40k → 7%NATIONAL CHAVEZ CENTER: $237k → 18%Lesbian & Gay Community Services Center Inc: $90k → 17%Community Development Corporation of Freedmen's Town: $25k → 16%EMMETT TILL INTERPRETIVE CENTER: $1.2M → 31%Beyond Boundaries: $50k → 22%Outside Las Vegas Foundation: $99k → 13%National Chavez Center: $186k → 18%EMMETT TILL INTERPRETIVE CENTER: $850k → 31%The Outside Las Vegas Foundation: $35k → 13%Brandywine Community Resource Council Inc: $26k → 10%NATIONAL CHAVEZ CENTER: $40k → 18%Emmett Till Interpretive Center: $200k → 31%Bangor YMCA: $25k → 15%Black Outside Inc: $37k → 16%Hispanic Access Foundation: $150k → 14%Tides Center-Spaces: $26k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$427M · 330 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

330 repeat relationships: 191 still active in FY2025, 139 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

330
258

Total granted

$427M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+21%

Still filing today

79%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    American Conservation Experience
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12M · revenue +98%
  • GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $8.1M · revenue +113% · 28% of their budget
  • CONSERVATION LEGACY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.5M · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • CN
    Chicago Neighborhood Initiatives Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $514k
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +31%
  • PL
    PRIDE LIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $450k · revenue +72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
America's State Parks Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
The Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust

The Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust leads and inspires action to conserve and enhance the landscape of the Mountains to Sound Greenway, ensuring a long-term balance between people and nature.

Environment
3
Conservation Lands Foundation

To protect, restore, and expand the National Conservation Lands through education,advocacy, and partnerships.

Environment
4
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
5
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
6
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
7
Discover Life in America Inc

Dlia will develop a model for research in biodiversity and will use the knowledge to develop and disseminate information to encourage the discovery, understanding, preservation, and enjoyment of natural resources.

Environment
8
The Equinox Preservation Trust Inc
Environment
9
Friends of the Columbia Gorge

Ensuring the gorge remains a vibrant, living place wondrous, wild, and accessible for all is at the core of what we do. friends of the columbia gorge works to protect, preserve, and steward the columbia gorge for future generations.

—
10
Coalition to Protect Americas National

Provide support and advocacy for the mission of the National Park Service. Educate the media and public about issues relevant to the management of the National Park Service and the national park system. Work with like-minded organizations…

Public Benefit
11
Friends of Ga State Parks & Histori

The mission of friends is to partner with, promote and preserve georgia state parks & historic sites. statewide, friends works to raise awareness of the economic and intrinsic values of georgia's greatest treasures. we work with state and…

Human Services
12
The Grand Canyon Trust Inc

The mission of the grand canyon trust is to safeguard the wonders of the grand canyon and the colorado plateau, while supporting the rights of its native peoples.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Somes-Meynell Wildlife Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

466 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 466 of the 624 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

78
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
166
Early backer (in before they grew)
456/466
Grantees still filing
319/466
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKS: $236,019,839 · OtherNATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKS+72 more: $58,355,662 · Other+72 moreAmerican Conservation Experience: $11,510,438 · EnvironmentAmerican Conserv…ZION NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION: $4,125,863 · EnvironmentZION NATURAL HIS…THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $4,049,322 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PU…Friends of Acadia: $3,455,372 · EnvironmentFriends of Acadi…GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY: $3,358,309 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS FRIENDS ALLIANCE: $3,206,543 · EnvironmentCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK: $2,121,535 · Environment+60 more: $31,197,121 · Environment+60 moreFriends of Katahdin Woods & Waters: $4,994,571 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF FLIGHT 93 NATIONAL MEMOR: $3,111,743 · Arts & CultureGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $1,575,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK: $1,376,480 · Arts & CultureTRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL: $1,265,074 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION INC: $1,093,746 · Arts & CultureSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureRIVER RAISIN NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK FOUNDATION INC: $870,112 · Arts & Culture+24 more: $7,500,109 · Arts & CultureYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $7,213,896 · Recreation & SportsTHE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC: $3,356,981 · Recreation & SportsROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $3,345,097 · Recreation & SportsEASTERN NATIONAL: $884,850 · Recreation & SportsGLACIER NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $818,982 · Recreation & SportsDiscover Your Northwest: $807,200 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK: $799,944 · Recreation & SportsAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $677,240 · Recreation & Sports+7 more: $2,173,705 · Recreation & SportsGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $8,079,949 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $997,863 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK: $996,713 · PhilanthropyFriends of Anacostia Park: $770,827 · Philanthropy+3 more: $587,356 · PhilanthropyCONSERVATION LEGACY: $7,509,728 · Youth DevelopmentWABANAKI YOUTH IN SCIENCE INC: $312,100 · Youth Development+1 more: $166,197 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS: $1,864,102 · EmploymentThe Corps Network: $1,137,500 · EmploymentCONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY INC: $302,482 · Employment
Other$294,375,501Environment$63,024,503Arts & Culture$22,786,835Recreation & Sports$20,077,895Philanthropy$11,432,708Youth Development$7,988,025Employment$3,304,084

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Conservation Experience: $11,510,438 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $8,079,949 over 6y, 28% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY: $7,509,728 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $7,213,896 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetThe Martin Luther King Jr Center For Nonviolent Social Change Inc: $6,550,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of Katahdin Woods & Waters: $4,994,571 over 8y, 53% of budgetSanta Monica Mountains Fund: $4,332,015 over 9y, 53% of budgetZION NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION: $4,125,863 over 9y, 14% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $4,049,322 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $3,668,137 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetFriends of Acadia: $3,455,372 over 8y, 14% of budgetGRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY: $3,358,309 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC: $3,356,981 over 9y, 68% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $3,345,097 over 9y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS FRIENDS ALLIANCE: $3,206,543 over 3y, 90% of budgetFRIENDS OF FLIGHT 93 NATIONAL MEMOR: $3,111,743 over 8y, 28% of budgetEMMETT TILL INTERPRETIVE CENTER: $2,216,000 over 3y, 63% of budgetCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK: $2,121,535 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetNORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS: $1,864,102 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetVOYAGEURS CONSERVANCY: $1,839,538 over 7y, 34% of budgetICE AGE TRAIL ALLIANCE INC: $1,761,020 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetSCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK: $1,628,187 over 6y, 12% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $1,591,437 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $1,575,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $1,490,609 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetINDEPENDENCE HISTORICAL TRUST: $1,470,117 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetMISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION: $1,453,672 over 9y, 37% of budgetALASKA GEOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION: $1,432,250 over 3y, 22% of budgetNATIONAL PARK TRUST INC: $1,406,963 over 9y, 8.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK: $1,376,480 over 9y, 61% of budgetCHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC: $1,344,575 over 3y, 10% of budgetDENALI EDUCATION CENTER: $1,268,100 over 8y, 35% of budgetTRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL: $1,265,074 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetSEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY: $1,244,015 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetGROUNDWORK USA INC: $1,191,587 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetThe Corps Network: $1,137,500 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetBALTIMORE HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION INC: $1,093,746 over 8y, 20% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTHWORKS: $1,062,397 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $1,030,377 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $997,863 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK: $996,713 over 5y, 52% of budgetWILD RIVERS CONSERVANCY OF THE ST CROIX & NAMEKAGON: $988,775 over 8y, 28% of budgetGREENING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $939,591 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetSHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK TRUST: $885,799 over 9y, 11% of budgetEASTERN NATIONAL: $884,850 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetRIVER RAISIN NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK FOUNDATION INC: $870,112 over 7y, 50% of budgetGLACIER NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $818,982 over 9y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Conservation Experience ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Martin Luther King Jr Center For Nonviolent Social Change Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Katahdin Woods & Waters ↗
  • Who funds Santa Monica Mountains Fund ↗
  • Who funds ZION NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS FRIENDS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FLIGHT 93 NATIONAL MEMOR ↗
  • Who funds EMMETT TILL INTERPRETIVE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS ↗
  • Who funds VOYAGEURS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ICE AGE TRAIL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE HISTORICAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA GEOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds DENALI EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL ↗
  • Who funds SEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDWORK USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Environmenta…The Outdoor FoundationNational Park Trust I…Rei Cooperative Actio…National Recreation F…National Forest Found…PatagoniaorgNational Fish and Wil…Community InitiativesThe Wilderness SocietyThe Corps NetworkBass Pro Shops & Cabe…
National Environmental Education and Training Foundation IncDC64.9× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Environmental Education and Training Foundation Inc · The Outdoor Foundation · National Park Trust Inc · Rei Cooperative Action Fund · National Recreation Foundation Incorporated · National Forest Foundation · Patagoniaorg · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Community Initiatives · The Wilderness Society · The Corps Network · Bass Pro Shops & Cabelas Outdoor Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Park Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Park Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Northwest Youth Corps: 100% of income from government
  • Education Development Center Inc: 65% of income from government
  • Rock Creek Conservancy Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Nashua River Watershed Assoc Inc: 54% of income from government
  • National Park Trust Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Boston Harbor Now Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Baltimore Heritage Area Association Inc: 42% of income from government
  • New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Alice Ferguson Foundation Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Uss Constitution Museum Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Anacostia Watershed Society Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Musconetcong Watershed Association: 14% of income from government
  • Friends of the Oregon Caves and Chateau: 11% of income from government
  • Living Classrooms Foundation: 7% of income from government
  • International Game Fish Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Maryland Economic Development Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 624 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Park’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home