· Public charity
National Football League Players Association
The purposes of the nflpa are to promote and advance all nfl players and the sport of professional football, and to improve the economic and other working conditions of players as the union and exclusive collective bargaining representative of players in the national football league.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $122,125 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $170,114 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $47,989 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $114k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOOD PROJECTS INC | $16,750 |
| TEAM RIVER RUNNER INC | $16,750 |
| THE VERB KIND INC | $16,750 |
| MEN'S HEALTH NETWORK | $16,750 |
| SILENCE THE SHAME INC | $16,750 |
| THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY | $15,000 |
| GENYOUTH INC | $15,000 |
| LAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA | $8,375 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC4× · 2017–2022 · $80k · revenue +119%
- FHFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC4× · 2018–2022 · $80k · revenue +30%
- AMActive Minds Inc3× · 2017–2020 · $60k · revenue +395%
Funded once
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +4%
American Diabetes Associationone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -4%
WESTERN JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $26k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…
Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…
Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…
Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…
Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stroud Development Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Active Minds Inc ↗
- Who funds WORKING AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Play Like a Girl ↗
- Who funds The Conscious Kid ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Silence the Shame Inc ↗
- Who funds GenYOUTH Incorporated ↗
- Who funds MEN'S HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GOOD PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds FORCE BLUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OFF THE FIELD ↗
- Who funds WESTERN JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES URBAN LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds UNITE HERE EDUCATION AND SUPPORT FUND ↗
- Who funds ED BLOCK COURAGE FOUNDATION INC FORMERLY ED BLOCK COURAGE AWARD FNDT INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BE THE CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM INC ↗
- Who funds SAMEHERE GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds Team River Runner Incorporated ↗
- Who funds STROUD DEVELOPMENT GROUP ↗
- Who funds THE VERB KIND INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BASKET OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds THE AUSCHWITZ JEWISH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON LEGAL EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nfl Foundation Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Sempra Foundation · Tides Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Football League Players Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Team River Runner Incorporated — 19% of income from government
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.