Skip to content

Alabama · Nonprofit

OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION

OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION (Alabama) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $831,827 to it, the largest being Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville ($481,801). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 58% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$433k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$832k
Net assets
$611k
2/6 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Operation Green Team Foundation does

Mission

Operation Green Team Foundation operates for charitable and educational purposes to support the City of Huntsville AL and supports beautification litter prevention energy efficiency recycling environmental stewardship nature engagement and education water conservation and sustainability.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM expenditures were made primarily for tree plantings in an effort to increase the Citys tree canopy and provide improved green space for needed areas. Trees were planted on behalf of the Friends of Trees project - $9.940.00 General Beautification - $12,554.04. The Trees4AL Grant provided $27,853.07 to plant trees at Cavalry Hill Community Center. Trees in the amount of $11,646.31 were purchased for our new Arboretum. KAB Grant for Cavalry Hill - $277.75 KAB grant for PPG Cleanup - $5,461.31 and TVA Grant for Remove the Privet Project - $3,526.33. -

    $71,259 spentof which $56,817 as grants
    29% of program spending
  2. GREEN AMBASSADOR PROGRAM - coordinated by the City of Huntsvilles Green Team in partnership with corporate sponsors whose mission is to educate and incentivize local youth to adopt sustainable environmental practices. The program is open to K-12th grade students teachers and administrators in the Huntsville community who are interested in supporting environmental education and practices through experiential education. Approved Green Ambassador teams compete and earn points in the program for year end awards. Expenses for the program include materials supplies and awards. $19337 was spent for awards environmental grants and fieldtrips. Corporate sponsorships totaled $25,000 and included Lockheed Martin and Leidos. Additional money will be carried forward for the program for the school year.

    $19,337 spentof which $25,000 as grants
    8% of program spending
  3. GOLDSMITH SCHIFFMAN WILDLIFE SANCTUARY - OGTF incurred various expenses for trees and other expenses as approved by the US Corp of Engineers and authorized through the Wetland Mitigation Bank Instrument MBI. Construction management oversight inspections monitoring and long-term management are required per the MBI. GSWS is a protected property through a conservation easement that ensures the property will forever remain in its natural restored or enhanced condition per the mitigation

    $13,523 spent
    5% of program spending
  4. Earth Day Program Expenses

    $8,445 spent
    3% of program spending
  5. NEEF Natl Environmental Education Foundation pledge was made. Expenditures were incurred related to the program including: Watershed educational tool and bus fields trips to Hays Nature Preserve to learn about the importance of wetlands.

    $4,222 spent
    2% of program spending
  6. BIKESHARE PROGRAM - Expenditures to Tandem Mobility for providing and maintaining bicycles strategically placed throughout parks and other areas in Huntsville AL for the public to use which promotes better health outdoor recreation clean and green transportation and sustainability in our community. This green means of transportation promotes better health for our citizens while enabling them to enjoy the outdoors and our scenic Huntsville areas.

    $132,000 spentof which $66,000 as grants
    53% of program spending
  7. Expenses incurred for education materials provided for Arbor Day

    $138 spent
    0% of program spending

The 7 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $248,924.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($282k) Expenses 100 ($240k) Net assets 100 ($266k)2021 Revenue 70 ($196k) Expenses 23 ($55k) Net assets 153 ($407k)2022 Revenue 36 ($103k) Expenses 125 ($300k) Net assets 148 ($394k)2023 Revenue 94 ($264k) Expenses 130 ($312k) Net assets 130 ($347k)2024 Revenue 66 ($186k) Expenses 44 ($105k) Net assets 161 ($427k)2025 Revenue 154 ($433k) Expenses 104 ($249k) Net assets 230 ($611k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (154)Expenses (104)Net assets (230)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $266k to $592k (+122%).

$266k
$592k
$394k
$347k
$427k
$611k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 4% · 2021 6% · 2022 19% · 2023 9% · 2024 3% · 2025 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

44% of OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$42k
’20
$141k
’21
−$197k
’22
−$48k
’23
$81k
’24
$184k
’25
29
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

202020212022202320242025
Listed555555
Joined·+1+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·10000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $354k → $111k.

3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 58% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 5 of 6 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION.

58%
largest funder
98%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 85% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 73% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

58% of OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $350k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Alabama, across 3 states.

IL
CT
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’22
Alabama out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $482k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin42% · top quartile
Months of reserve29.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alabama

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

AL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION?
OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION (Alabama) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $831,827 to it, the largest being Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville ($481,801). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 58% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $831,827 in grants to OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION?
Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville is the largest funder on record, with $481,801 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like OPERATION GREEN TEAM FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alabama. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing