· Public charity
National Disability Institute Inc
Ndi is dedicated to building a better economic future for people with disabilities and their families through financial education, asset development, public education, policy development training, technical assistance, and innovative collaborations with government, financial institutions, employers, and community organizations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIFESCAPE | $25,000 |
| DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION AND ADJUSTMENT FACILITIES INC (DBA DEAF INC) | $25,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE DISABLED (INSTITUTE FOR CAREER DEVELOPMENT) | $25,000 |
| SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC | $25,000 |
| UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF LONG ISLAND | $25,000 |
| EXCEPTIONAL PERSONS INC | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC | $25,000 |
| JVS HUMAN SERVICES | $25,000 |
| CARES OF WASHINGTON | $25,000 |
| EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC | $25,000 |
| DAKOTABILITIES | $25,000 |
| ST LOUIS ARC | $25,000 |
| WINNERS AT WORK INC DBA ABILITIES UNLIMITED | $25,000 |
| GOODWILL OF WESTERN MISSOURI AND EASTERN KANSAS | $25,000 |
| SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.
To provide employment and alternative service programs for developmentally disabled adults in the portland metro area.
Viability's mission is to build a world in which individuals with disabilities and other disadvantages realize acceptance, inclusion, and access.
Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…
Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.
Service enterprises, inc. of minnesota through effective partnerships, provides quality vocational training, job opportunities, habilitative and other services to individuals with disabilities to promote their independence and active…
Mission of northwest center services is to promote the growth, development, and independence of persons with disabilities through programs of therapy, education, and work opportunity.
To serve individuals with disabilities by educating, counseling, providing residential, social, therapeutic and employment supports, so as to empower them to achieve meaningful and valued roles in society.
To assist individuals with disabilities and disadvantages to live independent lives.
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
To develop the skills of individuals with abilities by providing opportunities for suitable, sustainable employment that result in greater independence. Individuals with abilities to be engaged in valuable work, integrated into their…
Developmental services center (dsc) supports people with disabilities in living a rich and meaningful life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Winners At Work Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association Apicda. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION AND ADJUSTMENT FACILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL PERSONS INC ↗
- Who funds POLICY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILDWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds DAKOTABILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ACCESS FUND ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA ACHIEVE ↗
- Who funds CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL OF WESTERN MISSOURI & EASTERN KANSAS ↗
- Who funds CARES OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SUFFOLK INC ↗
- Who funds Community Options Inc ↗
- Who funds WINNERS AT WORK INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
- Who funds ARISE CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds Opportunity Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ENDEAVORS INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds ServiceSource Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
- Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗
- Who funds ARC BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA ↗
- Who funds SOLDIERS' ANGELS ↗
- Who funds KENNETH YOUNG CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRANZISKA RACKER CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds MCS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Disability Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Easter Seals of Oregon — 77% of income from government
- Family and Community Together — 70% of income from government
- Opportunity Center Inc — 28% of income from government
- Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
- Community Options Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.