· Public charity
National Council on Problem Gambling Inc
To lead state and national stakeholders in the development of comprehensive policy and programs for all those affected by problem gambling in order to advance well-being by reducing the personal, social and economic costs of gambling-related harm.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DHPERFIL LATINO TV INC | $40,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACADEMY | $40,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OREGON | $40,000 |
| CIA SIAB INC | $40,000 |
| OREGON COUNCIL ON PROBLEM GAMBLING | $40,000 |
| THE ALCOHOLISM COUNCIL OF BUTLER COUNTY OHIO INC | $40,000 |
| CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| STUDENT ASSISTANCE SERVICES CORPORATION | $40,000 |
| RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK | $40,000 |
| NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION | $40,000 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $40,000 |
| CADCA | $40,000 |
| EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $40,000 |
| EVERGREEN COUNCIL ON PROBLEM GAMBLING | $39,000 |
| THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of National Council on Problem Gambling Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $565k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASTUDENT ASSISTANCE SERVICES CORPORATION2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue +27%
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF OREGON INC2× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +31%- NNNICASA NFP2× · 2022–2023 · $77k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- AEADEPT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MAINE INCone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +16%
- HUHISPANIC URBAN MINORITY ALCHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE OUTREACH PROGRAM INCone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +4%
- PGProblem Gambling Coalition of Coloradoone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead state and national stakeholders in the development of comprehensive policy and programs for all those affected by problem gambling in order to advance well-being by reducing the personal, social and economic costs of…
To improve the general well-being and education of the asian, pacific islander and other ethnic communities of san diego county. upac recognizes the diverse ethnic and cultural identities and strengths of these communities and their need…
Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.
The mission of the council is to provide information, education, prevention and referrals. thier goal is to educate the public regarding the treatment and prevention of the disease of alcoholism and chemical dependency and to help…
Human service organization involved in education, counseling, prevention and treatment of alcoholism and other chemical substance dependencies in conjunction primarily with new york state office of addiction services and supports. (oasas)
Our mission, since 1973, has been to promote hope, health and recovery among all people by creating an environment that is safe and free from the effects of substance use and addiction. the center provides substance use prevention,…
Sooar is a licensed community awareness information and training (cait) provider through the state of michigan department of community health substance abuse division. we are a growing and dynamic community enrichment and learning center…
Our mission is to provide recovery support services and reduce substance use through education and intervention. we also help young adults successfully transition into adulthood by providing services to address essential needs.
To be recognized as the premier substance abuse and addiction prevention provider in the midhudson region by implementing nationally established educational programs, policies, and services.
The council's mission: we change lives by empowering communities to prevent substance abuse and its related problems at home, school and work with proven, practical resources, prevention education and advocacy. their vision is to be the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alcoholism Council of Butler County and the most unlike its peers is Dh Perfil Latino Tv Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STUDENT ASSISTANCE SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF OREGON INC ↗
- Who funds NICASA NFP ↗
- Who funds DH PERFIL LATINO TV INC ↗
- Who funds CIA SIAB INC ↗
- Who funds ADEPT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MAINE INC ↗
- Who funds CADCA ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC URBAN MINORITY ALCHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE OUTREACH PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Problem Gambling Coalition of Colorado ↗
- Who funds NAMI MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO IN ARABIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALCOHOLISM COUNCIL OF BUTLER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds OREGON COUNCIL ON PROBLEM GAMBLING ↗
- Who funds TOWSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE FOR THE CAROLINAS INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION ↗
- Who funds LORAIN COUNTY ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds VISION Y COMPROMISO ↗
- Who funds NEVADA COUNCIL ON PROBLEM GAMBLING ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA COUNCIL ON COMPULSIVE GAMBLING ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Maryland Council of Problem Gamblin ↗
- Who funds ZEPF CENTER ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA ASSOC ON PROBLEM GAMBLING & GAMING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Council on Problem Gambling Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Council On Problem Gambling — 16% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.