Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

National Council on Problem Gambling Inc

To lead state and national stakeholders in the development of comprehensive policy and programs for all those affected by problem gambling in order to advance well-being by reducing the personal, social and economic costs of gambling-related harm.

$645k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
17
Grants FY2024
10
Organizations funded FY2023
90%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$40,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$40,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 10
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
13
Total assets, FY2024
$9.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 90% of the organizations National Council on Problem Gambling Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 89% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving17$645k88%
FY202310$369k90%
FY20227$258kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$843kHuman Services$120kEducation$110kRecreation & Sports$80kYouth Development$79kCivil Rights$40k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
NJ
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
NC
OK
AL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 29 grantees

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($68k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

National Council on Problem Gambling Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 27 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStudent Assistance Services Corporation: $80,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVolunteers of America of Oregon Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNicasa Nfp: $76,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAlcoholism Council of Butler County: $40,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetOhio in Arabic Foundation: $40,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetNicos Chinese Health Coalition: $40,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCadca: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFreedom House for the Carolinas Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetOregon Council on Problem Gambling: $40,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetAdept Educational Institute of Maine Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHispanic Urban Minority Alcholism and Drug Abuse Outreach Program Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCia Siab Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTowson University Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCambridge Health Alliance Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEast Carolina University Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetProblem Gambling Coalition of Colorado: $40,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetDh Perfil Latino Tv Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNami Maryland Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetLorain County Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services Inc: $37,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVision y Compromiso: $36,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNevada Council on Problem Gambling: $33,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetAlabama Council on Compulsive Gambling: $32,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetOhio State University Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaryland Council of Problem Gamblin: $27,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetZepf Center: $26,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma Assoc on Problem Gambling & Gaming Inc: $24,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 27.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare National Council on Problem Gambling Inc with peer funders

About National Council on Problem Gambling Inc

How much does National Council on Problem Gambling Inc give?
National Council on Problem Gambling Inc reported 17 grants totaling $645,250 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 10 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does National Council on Problem Gambling Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (66%), Human Services (9%), Education (9%).
Who are National Council on Problem Gambling Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Student Assistance Services Corporation ($80k), Volunteers of America of Oregon Inc ($80k), Nicasa Nfp ($77k).
Does National Council on Problem Gambling Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 90% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as National Council on Problem Gambling Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Blackbaud Giving Fund, Network for Good, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is National Council on Problem Gambling Inc based?
National Council on Problem Gambling Inc is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Council on Problem Gambling’s filings →

More from the funding graph