· Public charity
National Center for Teacher Residencies
Our mission is to transform educator preparation by advancing the teacher residency movement to prepare, support, and retain more effective educators who represent and value the communities they serve.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k42 grants · $5.3M
- $250k+5 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $330,000 |
| NASHVILLE TEACHER RESIDENCY | $329,629 |
| VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY (RICHMOND TEACHER RESIDENCY) | $305,000 |
| ST LOUIS TEACHER RESIDENCY | $300,000 |
| CAPITOL REGION EDUCATION COUNCIL (CREC) (CTTRP) | $273,686 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS | $240,000 |
| GREAT OAKS FOUNDATION | $240,000 |
| GSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION (CREATE TEACHER RESIDENCY) | $235,000 |
| SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS (MARSHALL STREET INITIATIVES) | $230,000 |
| PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION PROJECT INSPIRE TEACHER RESIDENCY | $220,000 |
| PUBLIC EDUCATION & BUSINESS COALITION (PEBC) | $220,000 |
| DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY | $215,000 |
| ALTERNATIVE PATHWAYS FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION COLUMBIA COLLEGE | $210,000 |
| EAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM | $200,000 |
| THE EDUCATE ME FOUNDATION INC | $170,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NTNashville Teacher Residency6× · 2020–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +148% · 47% of their budget
- CRCAPITOL REGION EDUCATION COUNCILFOUNDATION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +45% · 39% of their budget
- UOUniversity of St Thomas6× · 2020–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +34%
Funded once
- ANAtlanta Neighborhood Charter Schoolone grant, 2021 · $400k · revenue +14%
- MPMISSISSIPPI PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORSone grant, 2020 · $198k · revenue +4%
- LALOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2022 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
See schedule o.drake's mission is to provide an exceptional learning environment that prepares students for meaningful personal lives, professional accomplishments, and responsible global citizenship. the drake experience is distinguished…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alder Graduate School of Education and the most unlike its peers is Nashville Teacher Residency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Nashville Teacher Residency ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL REGION EDUCATION COUNCILFOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATOR ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds EAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC ↗
- Who funds TEACH ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BPE INC ↗
- Who funds Columbia College ↗
- Who funds OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds APPLETREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds ALDER GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds CSU BAKERSFIELD AUXILIARY FOR SPONSORED PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION ↗
- Who funds CHATTANOOGAHAMILTON COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds William Carey University ↗
- Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds GREAT OAKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC EDUCATION & BUSINESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Education ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Neighborhood Charter School ↗
- Who funds The Educate Me Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Livingstone College ↗
- Who funds Roosevelt University ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS ↗
- Who funds THE SHAW UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Educational Credit Management Corporation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Strada Education Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · Round It Up America Inc · Howard Hughes Medical Institute · Partnership for Education Advancement Inc · North Carolina Black Alliance Inc · United Negro College Fund Inc · Corporation for Public Broadcasting · Tulsa Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Center for Teacher Residencies funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Delaware State University — 18% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.