How much does National Asian Pacific Center on Aging give?

National Asian Pacific Center on Aging reported 7 grants totaling $1,579,354 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does National Asian Pacific Center on Aging fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (57%), Employment (43%), Community Improvement (1%).

Who are National Asian Pacific Center on Aging's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: National Able Network Inc ($12M), Greater Boston Chinese Golden Age Center ($6.1M), Self-Help for the Elderly ($3.0M).

Does National Asian Pacific Center on Aging fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as National Asian Pacific Center on Aging?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Cathay Bank Foundation, Gofundmeorg, Jpmorgan Chase Foundation.

Where is National Asian Pacific Center on Aging based?

National Asian Pacific Center on Aging is based in WA.

National Asian Pacific Center on Aging

National Asian Pacific Center on Aging at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Asian Pacific Center on Aging

Since 1979, empowering older adults through advocacy and access to resources essential to their well-being and independence, regardless of language or culture.

$1.6M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$789k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$18MEmployment$14MCommunity Improvement$169kHealth$114k

02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k2 grants · $67k
$50k–250k3 grants · $463k
$250k+2 grants · $1.0M

$182,467

Median grant

States reached

$3.7M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
BOSTON GOLDEN AGE CENTER	$789,093
SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY	$260,666
ACC SENIOR SERVICES	$201,462
KOREAN COMM SERVICES OF NY	$182,467
CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC	$78,583
PHILIP JAISOHN MEMORIAL FOUN	$38,333
SER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS	$28,750

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $12.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$33M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$33M

Still filing today

91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CultureOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GB
GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER
9× · 2017–2025 · $6.1M · revenue +74%
SF
SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY
9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +72%
KC
KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +126% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Asian-American Senior Citizen Association

Human Services

Family Bridges Inc

We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.

—

Asian Pacific Center for Human Development

To advance the well being of the asian american pacific islander community by providing culturally appropriate and integrated medical, behavioral, and related services.

Health

National Asian Pacific Center on Aging

Since 1979, empowering older adults through advocacy and access to resources essential to their well-being and independence, regardless of language or culture.

—

Kawabe Memorial House

To provide quality, secure affordable housing and culturally sensitive programs and services

Human Services

Chinese Culture and Community Service Center Inc

Provide cultural, social, sports, and educational services and serve functionally and/or cognitively impaired adults with a variety of health, social and other related services.

Arts & Culture

Korean Community Center of the East Bay

The mission of KCCEB is to empower the Korean American and other communities of the Bay Area through education, advocacy, service and the development of community-based resources.

—

Curry Senior Center

To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.

Human Services

Center for Pan Asian Community Services

To develop a comprehensive social and health service program to support diverse, multilingual, and under-resourced populations. the center service areas include health counseling, senior services, housing counseling, legal, education, and…

—

San Francisco Ladies Protection and Relief Society

Health

Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health

Chinese American Senior Services Association Inc

To provide nutrition Programs and other activities to Senior Citizens

Human Services

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Self-Help for the Elderly; the most unlike its peers is Ser-Jobs for Progress Inc San Joaquin Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

9/10

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$14,075,090Human Services$12,773,316Community Improvement$2,262,716Health$2,131,796Arts & Culture$1,321,513

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cathay Bank FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cathay Bank Foundation · Gofundmeorg · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Asian Pacific Center on Aging funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Asian Pacific Center on Aging. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on National Asian Pacific Center on Aging’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home