· Public charity
National Asian Pacific Center on Aging
Since 1979, empowering older adults through advocacy and access to resources essential to their well-being and independence, regardless of language or culture.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $67k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $463k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOSTON GOLDEN AGE CENTER | $789,093 |
| SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY | $260,666 |
| ACC SENIOR SERVICES | $201,462 |
| KOREAN COMM SERVICES OF NY | $182,467 |
| CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $78,583 |
| PHILIP JAISOHN MEMORIAL FOUN | $38,333 |
| SER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS | $28,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $12.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GBGREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $6.1M · revenue +74%
- SFSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +72%
- KCKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +126% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.
To advance the well being of the asian american pacific islander community by providing culturally appropriate and integrated medical, behavioral, and related services.
Since 1979, empowering older adults through advocacy and access to resources essential to their well-being and independence, regardless of language or culture.
Provide cultural, social, sports, and educational services and serve functionally and/or cognitively impaired adults with a variety of health, social and other related services.
To provide quality, secure affordable housing and culturally sensitive programs and services
The mission of KCCEB is to empower the Korean American and other communities of the Bay Area through education, advocacy, service and the development of community-based resources.
To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.
To develop a comprehensive social and health service program to support diverse, multilingual, and under-resourced populations. the center service areas include health counseling, senior services, housing counseling, legal, education, and…
Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…
To provide nutrition Programs and other activities to Senior Citizens
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Self-Help for the Elderly and the most unlike its peers is Ser-Jobs for Progress Inc San Joaquin Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL ABLE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON CHINESE GOLDEN AGE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY INC DBA ACC SENIOR SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SER-Jobs for Progress Inc San Joaquin Valley ↗
- Who funds CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILIP JAISOHN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cathay Bank Foundation · Gofundmeorg · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Asian Pacific Center on Aging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.