Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Ability Center

The NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER (the center) empowers individuals with disabilities by building self-esteem, confidence and lifetime skills through sport, recreation and educational programs.

$643k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $243,346 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $643,330 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $399,984 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $211k
$14,928
Median grant
5
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROTHERS KEEPERS$41,501
CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY SERVICES$32,817
CHEYANNA'S CHAMPIONS 4 CHILDREN$31,399
REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF THE CAPE AND ISLANDS CORP$26,508
UTAH SCHOOLS FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND$24,990
PROJECT OVERWATCH$16,115
PARENTS EMPOWERING ABLE KIDS (PEAK)$14,928
STAND4KIND$12,166
NEW FOCUS ACADEMY$10,295
CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590$7,383
IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC$7,108
HEROES HAVEN (DAS HOOAH)$7,073
WEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY$6,037
NK MEDICAL GROUP$5,026
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 46% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF THE CAPE AND ISLANDS CORP: $27k → 8%PROJECT OVERWATCH: $16k → 6%CHEYANNA'S CHAMPIONS 4 CHILDREN: $31k → 10%BROTHERS KEEPERS: $42k → 11%PARENTS EMPOWERING ABLE KIDS (PEAK): $15k → 5%WEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY: $6k → 5%IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC: $7k → 8%CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $7k → 9%NK MEDICAL GROUP: $5k → 12%CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY SERVICES: $33k → 14%NEW FOCUS ACADEMY: $10k → 5%STAND4KIND: $12k → 8%UTAH SCHOOLS FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND: $25k → 9%HEROES HAVEN (DAS HOOAH): $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freedom Revived

Freedom Revived is here to bring a proactive approach to serving those who serve us. We provide support and encouragement through a variety of services that revitalize mind, body, and spirit to our Frontline.

Human Services
2
Our Heroes Dreams

To improve the lives of our nations warriors (veterans, first responders, peace officers, and their families) by helping them build a new mission and purpose in life, support their recovery and reintegration, and empower them to accomplish…

Health
3
Wounded War Heroes

Wounded War Heroes was founded to show our appreciation to the men and women who have been wounded or injured as a result of serving our country, by providing them therapeutic outdoor experiences upon their return home from fighting for…

Public Benefit
4
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
5
Military Mobility

Military mobility specializes in off-road expeditions and resiliency training for veterans in need, to reduce the veteran suicide rate. our mission is to put clients in a team environment which fosters camaraderie, trust, and inspires the…

Human Services
6
Wild Warrior Adventure Inc

Wild Warrior Adventure works to prevents suicide, minimize PTSD among veterans and optimize veterans wellness through outdoor retreats and activities.

Public Benefit
7
Kaizen Adaptive Training Llc

Our mission is to inspire and empower individuals with physical or traumatic impairments by providing an all-inclusive functional fitness training program and fostering a sense of community for adaptive athletes.

Health
8
Wounded Warriors Abilities Ranch Co

Our mission is to inspire, motivate and strengthen warriors by providing various recreational activities in a safe and relaxing environment.

Public Benefit
9
Warfighter Scuba

To provide scuba instruction for veterans with ptsd. the weightlessness of scuba provides a peaceful respite from the pressures and trauma of military service. scuba for amputees provides a freedom of movement not experienced for years…

Public Benefit
10
Warfighter Outfitters

Warfighter Outfitters believe in the healing power of the outdoors. Since 2014, we have provided free fishing, hunting, and engagement trips to disabled veterans. On the water or in the woods, these veteran-only trips help service men and…

11
Challenge Accepted Inc

adaptive sports for disabled veterans

Public Benefit
12
At Liberty Connections
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wasatch Adaptive Sports Inc and the most unlike its peers is Daring Sisters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity Arts Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%37%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%66%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/56
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,509

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
13/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $26,508 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $24,990 · OtherSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC …PARENTS EMPOWERING ABLE KIDS (PEAK) — $14,928 · OtherPARENTS EMPOWERING ABLE KIDS (PEAK)NEW FOCUS ACADEMY — $10,295 · OtherNEW FOCUS ACADEMYCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590 — $7,383 · OtherCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUT…DAS HOOAH INC — $7,073 · OtherDAS HOOAH INCNK MEDICAL GROUP — $5,026 · OtherChildrens Oncology Services Inc — $32,817 · HealthChildrens Oncology Services IncCHEYANNA'S CHAMPIONS 4 CHILDREN — $31,399 · HealthCHEYANNA'S CHAMPIONS 4 CHILDRENIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC — $7,108 · HealthIHC HEALTH SERVICES INCJACKS BROTHERS KEEPERS — $41,501 · PhilanthropyJACKS BROTHERS KEEP…STAND4KIND — $12,166 · EducationWEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY — $6,037 · EducationPROJECT OVERWATCH — $16,115 · Membership Benefit
Other$96,203Health$71,324Philanthropy$41,501Education$18,203Membership Benefit$16,115

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJACKS BROTHERS KEEPERS — $41,501 over 7y, 42% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc — $32,817 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCHEYANNA'S CHAMPIONS 4 CHILDREN — $31,399 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetSTAND4KIND — $12,166 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC — $7,108 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY — $6,037 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JACKS BROTHERS KEEPERS
  • Who funds Childrens Oncology Services Inc
  • Who funds CHEYANNA'S CHAMPIONS 4 CHILDREN
  • Who funds PROJECT OVERWATCH
  • Who funds STAND4KIND
  • Who funds IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds WEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express FoundationNY10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Ability Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph