Skip to content
Nathalie & Gladys Dalkowitz Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Nathalie & Gladys Dalkowitz Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$243kArts & Culture$151kHealth$124kEducation$80kFood & Nutrition$56kYouth Development$53kCrime & Legal$38kCivil Rights$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO$10,000
GUIDE DOGS OF TEXAS$10,000
ALPHA HOME$10,000
FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION$10,000
CHILDSAFE$10,000
MC NAY ART MUSEUM$10,000
GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER OF$10,000
KINETIC KIDS INC$10,000
SAN ANTONIO FESTIVAL OF BOOKS INC$5,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA$5,000
SAN ANTONIO JEWISH SENIOR SERVICES$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO$5,000
AUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC$5,000
HAVEN FOR HOPE OF BEXAR COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $8k → 16%GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER OF: $10k → 16%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $10k → 16%GUIDE DOGS OF TEXAS: $10k → 16%CHILDSAFE: $10k → 16%CHILDSAFE: $8k → 16%GUARDIAN HOUSE: $10k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 16%ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $10k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $8k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$603k · 24 repeat orgs$272k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
24

Total granted

$603k
$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+11%

Still filing today

83%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
    4× · 2017–2023 · $38k · revenue +60%
  • CA
    Christian Assistance Ministry
    3× · 2019–2023 · $30k · revenue +81%
  • UO
    University of the Incarnate Word
    2× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • GH
    GUARDIAN HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • AB
    ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -8%
  • RR
    RISE RECOVERYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
2
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
3
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
4
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Antonio Inc

To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.

Health
5
Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
6
San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries Inc

Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.

—
7
San Antonio Council On Alcohol and Drug Awareness

To provide alcohol and drug use prevention, intervention and recovery services to children, youth and adults in the community.

—
8
Advocates Social Services of San Antonio Texas

To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…

—
9
San Anto Cultural Arts

To foster human and community development through community-based arts.

Arts & Culture
10
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
11
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
12
San Antonio Pets Alive Inc

The mission of San Antonio Pets Alive! is to save every adoptable dog and cat in danger of being killed at the City of San Antonio Shelter.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haven for Hope of Bexar County; the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
25/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $38,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $38,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKGOLDEN MANOR JEWISH SENIOR SERVICES: $28,000 · OtherGOLDEN MANOR JEWISH SENIOR SERVICESALPHA HOME INC: $20,000 · OtherMAGIK CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $20,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO: $18,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN DENTAL CLINIC: $18,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $28,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIOCHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO: $28,000 · OtherCHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIOHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $23,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $23,000 · Other+18 more: $136,000 · Other+18 moreChristian Assistance Ministry: $30,000 · Human ServicesChristian Assistance…Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesFamily Service Assoc…Respite Care of San Antonio Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesRespite Care of San …CHILDSAFE: $18,000 · Human ServicesCHILDSAFEGUARDIAN HOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesGUARDIAN HOUSEANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesANY BABY CAN OF SAN …Guide Dogs of Texas Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesGuide Dogs of Texas …GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesGUADALUPE COMMUNITY …REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesREACHING MAXIMUM IND…House of Neighborly Service of San Antonio Texas: $10,000 · Human ServicesHouse of Neighborly …ABODE CONTEMPLATIVE CARE: $10,000 · Human ServicesABODE CONTEMPLATIVE …THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $8,000 · Human ServicesSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC…Witte Museum: $28,000 · Arts & CultureWitte MuseumSAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $23,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO CHILDR…SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM…MCNAY ART MUSEUM: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMCNAY ART MUSEUMSOLI CHAMBER ENSEMBLE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSOLI CHAMBER ENSEM…CHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIO: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDRENS CHORUS O…SAN ANTONIO FESTIVAL OF BOOKS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureUniversity of the Incarnate Word: $30,000 · EducationSAN ANTONIO EDUCATION FUND DBA SAN ANTONIO EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 · EducationProject MEND: $18,000 · HealthRISE RECOVERY: $10,000 · HealthTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $8,000 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $30,000 · PhilanthropyRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKinetic Kids Inc: $28,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$456,000Human Services$164,000Arts & Culture$146,000Education$40,000Health$36,000Philanthropy$35,000Recreation & Sports$28,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $38,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetChristian Assistance Ministry: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of the Incarnate Word: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc: $28,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWitte Museum: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $28,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO: $28,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $23,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA HOME INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN DENTAL CLINIC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetProject MEND: $18,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDSAFE: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGUARDIAN HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRISE RECOVERY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGuide Dogs of Texas Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO EDUCATION FUND DBA SAN ANTONIO EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOLI CHAMBER ENSEMBLE: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetGUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIO: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHouse of Neighborly Service of San Antonio Texas: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetABODE CONTEMPLATIVE CARE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FESTIVAL OF BOOKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marcia & Otto Koehler…San Antonio Area Foun…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Faye L & William L Co…Elizabeth Huth Coates…Harvey E Najim Charit…Pryor Myra Stafford C…The Charity Ball Asso…Mays Family FoundationSt Luke's Lutheran He…The Texas Cavaliers C…John L Santikos Chari…
Marcia & Otto Koehler FoundationTX70.5× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Mays Family Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nathalie & Gladys Dalkowitz Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nathalie & Gladys Dalkowitz Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nathalie & Gladys Dalkowitz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home