Skip to content
Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$169kFood & Nutrition$161kEducation$90kHuman Services$49kEnvironment$41kHealth$33kInternational$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $138k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER FOOD DEPOSITORY OF CHICAGO$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000
NAPLES CHILDREN AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION$17,500
MOTE$10,000
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SARASOTA MANATEE INC$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
SAVE THE ELEPHANTS AWF$10,000
LAKE FOREST ACADEMY$10,000
WORLD CENRAL KITCHEN$10,000
THE SERVICE CLUB OF CHICAGO$7,500
FOOTHILLS HUMANE SOCIETY$7,000
PARROT OUTREACH SOCIETY$7,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$6,500
ASPCA$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MORNINGSTAR MISSION: $4k → 7%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
CA
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$630k · 26 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
22

Total granted

$630k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+39%

Still filing today

69%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +76%
  • FH
    Foothills Humane Society Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +25%
  • LF
    LAKE FOREST ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • A
    AMVETS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +196%
  • LB
    LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
2
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
3
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
4
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
5
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
6
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
7
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
8
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
9
Safe Haven for Cats

The mission of safe haven for cats is to use no-kill principles and education to save cats' lives through rescue, adoption, spay/neuter services and community programs.

Animals
10
Paws Chicago

Paws chicago is a national leader in the no kill animal welfare movement, helping more than 23,842 homeless and at-risk pets each year through comprehensive spay/neuter, medical, and adoption programs.

Animals
11
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
12
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Children Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
31/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER FOOD DEPOSITORY OF CHICAGO: $109,834 · OtherGREATER FOOD DEPOSITORY OF CHICAGOMOTE: $59,000 · OtherMOTEMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $46,833 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INCUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SARASOTA MANATEE INC: $23,000 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SARASOTA MANATEE INCJOLIET JR COLLEGE LAIRD OZMON SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $22,500 · OtherJOLIET JR COLLEGE LAIRD OZMON SCHOLARSHIP FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherSAVE THE ELEPHANTS AWF: $14,500 · OtherTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION: $17,000 · OtherTRYON FINE ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 · Other+21 more: $93,333 · Other+21 moreFoothills Humane Society Inc: $43,000 · AnimalsFoothills Humane Soc…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $24,500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY…WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC: $22,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CENTER OF V…PAWS PRAYERS & PROMISES: $19,500 · AnimalsPAWS PRAYERS & PROMI…The Anti-Cruelty Society: $15,000 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty Soc…Parrot Outreach Society Inc: $7,000 · AnimalsNAPLES ZOO INC: $5,000 · Animals+2 more: $5,000 · AnimalsLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $40,000 · EducationLAKE FORES…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…CHICAGO ARTS PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION: $5,000 · EducationCHICAGO AR…SARASOTA SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES INC: $5,000 · EducationSARASOTA S…International Rescue Committee INC: $23,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,000 · InternationalFoothills Equestrian Nature Center Inc: $15,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $12,000 · EnvironmentThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $11,500 · EnvironmentTHERMAL BELT OUTREACH MINISTRY INC: $32,000 · Food & NutritionNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HUSKIES HOCKEY CLUB INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$421,000Animals$141,000Education$72,000International$46,500Environment$38,500Food & Nutrition$32,000Philanthropy$21,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $46,833 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetFoothills Humane Society Inc: $43,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHERMAL BELT OUTREACH MINISTRY INC: $32,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $24,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC: $22,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS PRAYERS & PROMISES: $19,500 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRYON FINE ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFoothills Equestrian Nature Center Inc: $15,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOTHILLS EQUESTRIAN TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $9,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetTHE SERVICE CLUB OF CHICAGO: $8,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetParrot Outreach Society Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO ARTS PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSARASOTA SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlley Cat Rescue Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $3,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUSKIES HOCKEY CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM ILLINOIS HOCKEY CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRYON RIDING & HUNT CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lomax Family Foun…Duke Energy FoundationCharles Stewart Mott …Polk County Community…AbbVie FoundationGe Aerospace Foundati…Chubb Charitable Foun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Chicago Community…Baird Foundation IncThe Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…
The Lomax Family FoundationNC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lomax Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Polk County Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nat P Ozmon Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home