· Private foundation
Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $138k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $20,000 |
| GREATER FOOD DEPOSITORY OF CHICAGO | $20,000 |
| NAPLES CHILDREN AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $17,500 |
| WORLD CENRAL KITCHEN | $10,000 |
| MOTE | $10,000 |
| SAVE THE ELEPHANTS AWF | $10,000 |
| LAKE FOREST ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SARASOTA MANATEE INC | $10,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE SERVICE CLUB OF CHICAGO | $7,500 |
| PARROT OUTREACH SOCIETY | $7,000 |
| FOOTHILLS HUMANE SOCIETY | $7,000 |
| ASPCA | $6,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS INC5× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +76%
- FHFoothills Humane Society Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +25%
- LFLAKE FOREST ACADEMY7× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGOgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +196%
- AAMVETSone grant, 2017 · $10k
- LBLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.
The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…
Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
The mission of safe haven for cats is to use no-kill principles and education to save cats' lives through rescue, adoption, spay/neuter services and community programs.
Paws chicago is a national leader in the no kill animal welfare movement, helping more than 23,842 homeless and at-risk pets each year through comprehensive spay/neuter, medical, and adoption programs.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Children Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds Foothills Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds LAKE FOREST ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THERMAL BELT OUTREACH MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS PRAYERS & PROMISES ↗
- Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SANNEH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRYON FINE ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Foothills Equestrian Nature Center Inc ↗
- Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILLS EQUESTRIAN TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE SERVICE CLUB OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Parrot Outreach Society Inc ↗
- Who funds LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO ARTS PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds MORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Alley Cat Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lomax Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Polk County Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Nat P Ozmon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.