Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nasgovitz Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$511kEnvironment$176kInternational$165kArts & Culture$115kSocial Science$113kYouth Development$85kPublic Benefit$73kHuman Services$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
$12,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JR ACHIEVEMENT OF WI$35,000
BADGER INSTITUTE$25,000
ST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL$15,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$15,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$15,000
SPARK ARTS MISSOULA CITY$12,500
DUCKS UNLIMITED$12,500
LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$10,000
INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE$10,000
MCPS FINE ARTS$5,000
LITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION$5,000
ALL IN MILWAUKEE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIVA: $25k → 10%OAXACA LENDING LIBRARY: $40k → 11%WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY: $15k → 17%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO: $15k → 14%KIVA: $25k → 10%WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY: $15k → 17%KIVA: $25k → 10%KIVA: $25k → 10%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $25k → 14%KIVA: $25k → 10%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $25k → 14%KIVA: $20k → 10%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $25k → 14%KIVA: $20k → 10%ST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL: $15k → 17%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $25k → 14%INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $23k → 10%JAWA SCHOLARSHIP: $15k → 17%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $25k → 14%INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $20k → 10%ST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL: $15k → 17%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $20k → 14%INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $15k → 10%JAWA SCHOLARSHIP: $15k → 17%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $20k → 14%INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $15k → 10%ST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL: $15k → 17%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $19k → 14%INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $15k → 10%JAWA SCHOLARSHIP: $15k → 17%CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $15k → 14%ST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL: $15k → 17%ST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL: $15k → 17%ST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL: $15k → 17%ST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL: $15k → 17%URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER: $20k → 17%MILWAUKEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL (MLHS): $20k → 17%MILWAUKEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL (MLHS): $20k → 17%MILWAUKEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL (MLHS): $20k → 17%MILWAUKEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL (MLHS): $15k → 17%BADGER INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%BADGER INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%BADGER INSTITUTE: $15k → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MILWAUKEE: $15k → 17%LHSAGM: $15k → 17%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF WI: $35k → 17%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF WI: $25k → 17%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF WI: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 22 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +86% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$1.3M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+86%

Still filing today

59%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $113k · revenue +116%
  • DU
    Ducks Unlimited Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +99%
  • BADGER INSTITUTE INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $73k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • OL
    OAXACA LENDING LIBRARY
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • L
    LHSAGM
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SA
    SMS AUCTION FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Academy of International Business

We create, nurture, and empower a global community of scholars focused on creating, advancing, and disseminating knowledge in international business research, education, policy, and practice.

Education
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
6
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
7
Wisconsin Bankers Association

We actively advocate, educate and support our members to help them positively impact the wisconsin communities they serve.

—
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college dedicated to the education of professional artists and the further advancement of art in the community.

Education
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Milwaukee School of Engineering

Milwaukee school of engineering (msoe) is a nonprofit, nonsectarian university providing a balanced education at the undergraduate and graduate level in the disciplines of engineering business, mathematics, and nursing. (see schedule o)…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Ecology Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $198,500 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMYTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $113,000 · OtherTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTEST MONICA HOME & SCHOOL: $105,000 · OtherST MONICA HOME & SCHOOLMILWAUKEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL (MLHS): $97,500 · OtherMILWAUKEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL (MLHS)JR ACHIEVEMENT OF WI: $85,000 · OtherJR ACHIEVEMENT OF WIIndividual grant recipient: $81,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOAXACA LENDING LIBRARY: $40,000 · OtherSPARK ARTS MISSOULA CITY: $32,500 · OtherWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY: $40,000 · Other+13 more: $168,750 · Other+13 moreKIVA MICROFUNDS: $165,000 · InternationalKIVA MICROFU…Ducks Unlimited Inc: $106,000 · EnvironmentDucks Unlim…URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentURBAN ECOLO…BADGER INSTITUTE INC: $73,000 · Public BenefitMISSOULA ART MUSEUM: $67,000 · Arts & CultureLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $22,500 · EducationDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $20,000 · EducationALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC: $15,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $41,250 · Housing & Shelter
Other$961,250International$165,000Environment$156,000Public Benefit$73,000Arts & Culture$67,000Education$57,500Housing & Shelter$41,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $165,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $113,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $106,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBADGER INSTITUTE INC: $73,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetMISSOULA ART MUSEUM: $67,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $41,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTELLER WILDLIFE REFUGE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds BADGER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY WORLD LTD ↗
  • Who funds TELLER WILDLIFE REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rite-Hite Foundation IncWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rite-Hite Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nasgovitz Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nasgovitz Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nasgovitz Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Nasgovitz Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nasgovitz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph