Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nancy Glazer Dickman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$93kEducation$49kReligion$19kHealth$17kHuman Services$16kPhilanthropy$12kFood & Nutrition$11kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$359k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCDONOGH SCHOOL$10,000
BALT ANIMAL RESCUE & CARE SHELTER$3,000
CHIZUK AMUNO CONGREGATION$3,000
CHAI4EVER$3,000
CHAI LIFELINE$3,000
VESTED INTEREST IN K9S$3,000
TALL TAILS RESCUE$2,500
ASSOC JEWISH COM FEDERATION OF BALT$2,000
BALTIMORE HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
THE AKC HUMANE FUND$2,000
MARYLAND SPCA$2,000
MARYLAND FOOD BANK$2,000
FALLSTON ANIMAL RESCUE MOVEMENT$1,500
PROJECT K-9 HERO$1,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS MAGEN DAVID ADOM$1,150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHAI4EVER: $3k → 11%CHAI4EVER: $3k → 11%CHAI4EVER: $3k → 11%CHAI4EVER: $3k → 11%CHAI4EVER: $2k → 11%CHAI4EVER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$229k · 18 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -34% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$229k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-34%

Still filing today

72%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $675 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +19%
  • BA
    BALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +56%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS MAGON DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • ND
    NO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
3
Animal Rescue Mission

To rescue and rehabilitate dogs and cats and place them in forever homes.

Animals
4
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals
5
Animal Rescue Force Inc

Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.

Animals
6
Hero Rescue Incorporated

The hero rescue is formed by a network of volunteers and fosters committed to saving lives of animals at risk of euthanasia, abuse, and neglect. by relocating animals from over crowded shelters to maryland for adequate veterinary care,…

Animals
7
Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The mission of the mspca is to protect animals, relieve their suffering, advance their health and welfare, prevent cruelty and work for a just and compassionate society.

Animals
8
Animal Dominion Rescue

Animal Dominion Rescue is a non-profit organization dedicated to rescuing cats and dogs worldwide, ensuring they find permanent, loving homes. The organization emphasizes direct support to rescuers on the ground, promoting animal welfare,…

Animals
9
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
10
The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue

Is a volunteer-based non profit organization that saves dogs and cats from death (high kill shelters) and adopts them to loving families.

Animals
11
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
12
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Maryland Spca Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Maryland Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS — $18,000 · AnimalsBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELT…Fallston Animal Rescue Movement Inc — $12,000 · AnimalsFallston Animal Rescue Movement IncTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC — $10,800 · AnimalsTHE MARYLAND SPCA INCThe AKC Humane Fund Inc — $10,800 · AnimalsThe AKC Humane Fund IncTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC — $10,800 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE COUNTY…VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC — $9,000 · AnimalsVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INCPROJECT K9 HERO — $6,700 · AnimalsPROJECT K9 HERO+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsCHIZUK AMUNO CONGREGATION — $18,000 · OtherCHIZUK AMUNO CONGREGATIONASSOC JEWISH COM FEDERATION OF BALT — $12,000 · OtherASSOC JEWISH COM FEDERATION OF B…THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $11,200 · OtherTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INCTALL TAILS RESCUE — $10,000 · OtherTALL TAILS RESCUEVESTED INTEREST IN K9S — $9,000 · OtherVESTED INTEREST IN K9SFRISKY'S WILDLIFE REHAB & SANCTUARY — $4,100 · OtherFRISKY'S WILDLIFE REHAB & SANCTU…+2 more — $1,825 · OtherMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $49,000 · EducationMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPO…CHAI 4EVER INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 · Human ServicesCHAI LIFELINE INC — $16,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $3,450 · International
Animals$79,100Other$66,125Education$49,000Human Services$18,000Health$16,000International$3,450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $49,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS — $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC — $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFallston Animal Rescue Movement Inc — $12,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $11,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC — $10,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe AKC Humane Fund Inc — $10,800 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC — $10,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT K9 HERO — $6,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $3,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds BALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS
  • Who funds CHAI 4EVER INC
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC
  • Who funds Fallston Animal Rescue Movement Inc
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC
  • Who funds The AKC Humane Fund Inc
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC
  • Who funds PROJECT K9 HERO
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds NO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nancy Glazer Dickman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc11% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc2% of income from government
  • Mcdonogh School Incorporated0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph